 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
An image of a nuclear reactor I made recently. Can't quite get the glow effect I
wanted.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'untitled.jpg' (542 KB)
Preview of image 'untitled.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12/20/2016 3:29 PM, jhu wrote:
> An image of a nuclear reactor I made recently. Can't quite get the glow effect I
> wanted.
>
It looks good but if I were you I would shut it down PDQ. It should not
be glowing :-P
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 20.12.2016 um 16:53 schrieb Stephen:
> On 12/20/2016 3:29 PM, jhu wrote:
>> An image of a nuclear reactor I made recently. Can't quite get the
>> glow effect I
>> wanted.
>>
>
> It looks good but if I were you I would shut it down PDQ. It should not
> be glowing :-P
Cherenkov radiation. Perfectly normal for an active nuclear reactor.
Maybe a bit too purple though.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12/20/2016 4:05 PM, clipka wrote:
> Am 20.12.2016 um 16:53 schrieb Stephen:
>> On 12/20/2016 3:29 PM, jhu wrote:
>>> An image of a nuclear reactor I made recently. Can't quite get the
>>> glow effect I
>>> wanted.
>>>
>>
>> It looks good but if I were you I would shut it down PDQ. It should not
>> be glowing :-P
>
> Cherenkov radiation. Perfectly normal for an active nuclear reactor.
>
Okay you stay and watch it. I will run away. ;)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 20.12.2016 um 17:17 schrieb Stephen:
> On 12/20/2016 4:05 PM, clipka wrote:
>> Am 20.12.2016 um 16:53 schrieb Stephen:
>>> On 12/20/2016 3:29 PM, jhu wrote:
>>>> An image of a nuclear reactor I made recently. Can't quite get the
>>>> glow effect I
>>>> wanted.
>>>>
>>>
>>> It looks good but if I were you I would shut it down PDQ. It should not
>>> be glowing :-P
>>
>> Cherenkov radiation. Perfectly normal for an active nuclear reactor.
>>
> Okay you stay and watch it. I will run away. ;)
Well, I did /not/ call it perfectly normal to stand around and watch a
nuclear reactor core up close while it looks like that. Better get a few
feet of concrete between you and that glow.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka <ano### [at] anonymous org> wrote:
> Am 20.12.2016 um 17:17 schrieb Stephen:
> > On 12/20/2016 4:05 PM, clipka wrote:
> >> Am 20.12.2016 um 16:53 schrieb Stephen:
> >>> On 12/20/2016 3:29 PM, jhu wrote:
> >>>> An image of a nuclear reactor I made recently. Can't quite get the
> >>>> glow effect I
> >>>> wanted.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> It looks good but if I were you I would shut it down PDQ. It should not
> >>> be glowing :-P
> >>
> >> Cherenkov radiation. Perfectly normal for an active nuclear reactor.
> >>
> > Okay you stay and watch it. I will run away. ;)
>
> Well, I did /not/ call it perfectly normal to stand around and watch a
> nuclear reactor core up close while it looks like that. Better get a few
> feet of concrete between you and that glow.
Apparently you get superpowers if you're exposed to the stuff.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"jhu" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> An image of a nuclear reactor I made recently. Can't quite get the glow effect I
> wanted.
Good detailed replica of the one shown at
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f2/Advanced_Test_Reactor.jpg
Maybe some kind of combination of scattering+emitting media with radiosity and
camera blur would help?
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
jhu wrote on 20/12/2016 16:29:
> An image of a nuclear reactor I made recently. Can't quite get the glow effect I
> wanted.
>
I like your image (at the moment is my desktop wallpaper). Compared with
the Wikipedia one, perhaps it lacks some ground fog.
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"jhu" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> An image of a nuclear reactor I made recently. Can't quite get the glow effect I
> wanted.
While I haven't seen a reactor core in person, in the photos I've seen, the glow
is on the slightly green side of blue. I would describe it as cerulean.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2016/12/20 05:29 PM, jhu wrote:
> An image of a nuclear reactor I made recently. Can't quite get the glow effect I
> wanted.
>
try a cyanish light colour something like <.8,.9,1>
--
________________________________________
-Nekar Xenos-
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
