|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That's very nice :)
I would love to see a whole lot more of these puzzles.
It would be one more thing to show my son that's not some "anonymously" coded
video game.
{Though Monsters Ate My Birthday Cake (MAMBC) really is a very good game.}
I do have a question about real wooden blocks. The ones I have seen up close
have a very interesting scalloped grooving where the background of the letters
and numbers are "differenced" out. And the internal edges where that grooving
begins and ends is _sharp_ . It's not pressed in, and if it's cut, I don't see
how.
https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/z/abc-wooden-block-letters-18353999.jpg
I wondering how they do it!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 8/2/2016 5:06 PM, clipka wrote:
> one of which
> does not follow the usual pattern of common "spot the difference" image
> pairs.
How true. I had to rotate the image 180° to spot it. (A handy hint when
looking at images you want to inspect closely.)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 8/2/2016 5:02 PM, omniverse wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>> On 8/2/2016 3:13 AM, omniverse wrote:
>>> Got to ask. Is it just my eyes or is the only 3D thing the block on the right?
>>> Because somehow I'm not seeing anything else as 3D, with any depth. Like I said,
>>> maybe it's my 3D visual interpretation messing up.
>>>
>>> Sorry if I'm spoiling the puzzle already!
>>>
>>
>> It's not a 3d picture for once. There are two similar images and you
>> have to spot the differences.
>
> I was sure the X block was a hint to do cross-eyed 3D! And it really makes for 3
> differences that way.
>
Too subtle for this group, I'm afraid. :-)
> I suggest people give that a look anyhow.
>
I tried but the image is too large for me to get it to work.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 02.08.2016 um 18:22 schrieb Bald Eagle:
> I do have a question about real wooden blocks. The ones I have seen up close
> have a very interesting scalloped grooving where the background of the letters
> and numbers are "differenced" out. And the internal edges where that grooving
> begins and ends is _sharp_ . It's not pressed in, and if it's cut, I don't see
> how.
>
> https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/z/abc-wooden-block-letters-18353999.jpg
>
> I wondering how they do it!
My guess would be multi-pass milling with a very fine milling bit for
the final pass.
The only alternative I can think of would be to produce the faces of the
cubes (the "frames" and letters) as separate sheets of wood, and glue
them onto the cubes; in that case the grooved pattern could also serve a
technical purpose, namely to improve the bonding.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 01/08/2016 9:36 PM, StephenS wrote:
> A test of a new kind of picture I would like to start making sometimes.
> Easy enough to not need answers provided.
>
> For this one, a difference between two pictures.
>
> Comments welcome:
>
> Stephen S
Maybe I should use, a difference between two scenes?
Comments welcome:
Stephen S
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 02/08/2016 8:15 PM, StephenS wrote:
> On 01/08/2016 9:36 PM, StephenS wrote:
>> A test of a new kind of picture I would like to start making sometimes.
>> Easy enough to not need answers provided.
>>
>> For this one, a difference between two pictures.
>>
>> Comments welcome:
>>
>> Stephen S
> Maybe I should use, a difference between two scenes?
>
> Comments welcome:
>
> Stephen S
And picture.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'picturepuzzeltestb.png' (245 KB)
Preview of image 'picturepuzzeltestb.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 01/08/2016 9:36 PM, StephenS wrote:
> A test of a new kind of picture I would like to start making sometimes.
> Easy enough to not need answers provided.
>
> For this one, a difference between two pictures.
>
> Comments welcome:
>
> Stephen S
How many three's.
Comments welcome:
Stephen S
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'characture_set0004.png' (168 KB)
Preview of image 'characture_set0004.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2-8-2016 19:03, Stephen wrote:
> On 8/2/2016 5:02 PM, omniverse wrote:
>> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>>> On 8/2/2016 3:13 AM, omniverse wrote:
>>>> Got to ask. Is it just my eyes or is the only 3D thing the block on
>>>> the right?
>>>> Because somehow I'm not seeing anything else as 3D, with any depth.
>>>> Like I said,
>>>> maybe it's my 3D visual interpretation messing up.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry if I'm spoiling the puzzle already!
>>>>
>>>
>>> It's not a 3d picture for once. There are two similar images and you
>>> have to spot the differences.
>>
>> I was sure the X block was a hint to do cross-eyed 3D! And it really
>> makes for 3
>> differences that way.
>>
>
> Too subtle for this group, I'm afraid. :-)
My eyes are too old to be able to do that anymore.
>
>> I suggest people give that a look anyhow.
>>
>
> I tried but the image is too large for me to get it to work.
>
As far as I can tell, the differences have nothing to do with 3D.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Found 3 in "b".
Not sure I have all 3's from "c" picture, unless 3 is all. Wouldn't want to be
timed on this anyway. Makes me feel slow.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 03/08/2016 3:15 AM, omniverse wrote:
> Found 3 in "b".
> Not sure I have all 3's from "c" picture, unless 3 is all. Wouldn't want to be
> timed on this anyway. Makes me feel slow.
>
Was trying to make 2 in "b", with 1 more not provable.
Stephen S
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |