From: Christian Froeschlin
Subject: Re: Rendering two sheets of paper
Date: 21 Mar 2016 16:08:45
Message: <56f054cd$1@news.povray.org>
Here is a test with marble texture. Not that I would necessarily
recommend it over geometric solution. Although with geometry it may
be more fiddly to get rid of the "regular" pattern look.
From: dick balaska
Subject: Re: Rendering two sheets of paper
Date: 21 Mar 2016 16:58:42
Message: <56f06082$1@news.povray.org>
Am 2016-03-21 10:43, also sprach Stephen:
>> Ten sheets of paper as stacked bicubic patches.>
That looks awfully thick for 10 sheets. More like 50.
--
dik
From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Rendering two sheets of paper
Date: 21 Mar 2016 17:22:43
Message: <56f06623$1@news.povray.org>
On 3/21/2016 8:58 PM, dick balaska wrote:
> Am 2016-03-21 10:43, also sprach Stephen:>>>> Ten sheets of paper as stacked bicubic patches.>>> That looks awfully thick for 10 sheets. More like 50.>
Quality parchment. :-P
--
Regards
Stephen
From: Stephen
Subject: Re: Rendering two sheets of paper
Date: 21 Mar 2016 17:23:45
Message: <56f06661$1@news.povray.org>
On 3/21/2016 8:08 PM, Christian Froeschlin wrote:
> Here is a test with marble texture. Not that I would necessarily> recommend it over geometric solution. Although with geometry it may> be more fiddly to get rid of the "regular" pattern look.>
I looks good enough to me. :)
--
Regards
Stephen
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Rendering two sheets of paper
Date: 22 Mar 2016 03:40:20
Message: <56f0f6e4@news.povray.org>
On 21-3-2016 21:08, Christian Froeschlin wrote:
> Here is a test with marble texture. Not that I would necessarily> recommend it over geometric solution. Although with geometry it may> be more fiddly to get rid of the "regular" pattern look.>
The problem with a texture would be that you could not have papers of
(slightly) different sizes or stacked randomly.
--
Thomas
