|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 5-3-2016 10:05, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> Nothing really new in a visual sense, but this image uses now meshes
> instead isosurfaces, thanks to meshrelief.inc by Bill Pragnell. Maybe
> the detail is not as great, but is very similar and the render time has
> dropped insanely (this one has bigger size, more objects, focal blur,
> and it renders just under half an hour). Maybe now I will be able to add
> translucency and some wet-surfaces effect.
>
> (Yes, I know I overdid the focal blur and it looks like a toy cave... :)
>
I love toy caves. ;-) This one looks very believable. Good job indeed.
It has been some time since I used meshrelief last but it is a nice and
useful tool.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3/5/2016 4:05 AM, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> and it looks like a toy cave... :)
It does. It looks like something Aardman would build.
--
dik
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Trying the rocks/stalagmites/stalactites code on a different cave with a
bit more complex geometry. Works, but tracing from a central point isn't
the best method for the rocks... will try hg-povray next for a different
approach.
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'the-cave-ii-02-21m.jpg' (179 KB)
Download 'the-cave-ii-03-26m.jpg' (198 KB)
Preview of image 'the-cave-ii-02-21m.jpg'
Preview of image 'the-cave-ii-03-26m.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yes, the structures certainly have improved a lot! I like it. Try to use
less stalactites and -mites in the middle, or shorter ones, so the view
to the illuminated part is better.
On 05.03.2016 04:05, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> Nothing really new in a visual sense, but this image uses now meshes
> instead isosurfaces, thanks to meshrelief.inc by Bill Pragnell. Maybe
> the detail is not as great, but is very similar and the render time has
> dropped insanely (this one has bigger size, more objects, focal blur,
> and it renders just under half an hour). Maybe now I will be able to add
> translucency and some wet-surfaces effect.
>
> (Yes, I know I overdid the focal blur and it looks like a toy cave... :)
>
> --
> jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
A test of the "sunlight-coming-trough-a-hole-on-the-ceiling" idea...
looks promising.
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'the-cave-ii-06-3h42m.jpg' (111 KB)
Preview of image 'the-cave-ii-06-3h42m.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 8-3-2016 8:17, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> A test of the "sunlight-coming-trough-a-hole-on-the-ceiling" idea...
> looks promising.
>
It does indeed.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote on 08/03/2016 8.17:
> A test of the "sunlight-coming-trough-a-hole-on-the-ceiling" idea...
> looks promising.
>
> --
> jaime
This one is magnificent!
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> wrote:
>
> > http://www.infradead.org/~wmp/macro_meshrelief.html
>
> I just had to add: WOW! What a piece of work!
>
> --
> jaime
I was persuaded. Will try it one day.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Just sent an speleologist there to see what he can discover...
(model from archive3d.net)
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'the-cave-ii-07-46m.jpg' (146 KB)
Preview of image 'the-cave-ii-07-46m.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 9-3-2016 21:00, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
> Just sent an speleologist there to see what he can discover...
>
>
> (model from archive3d.net)
>
LOL. Well done. Your cave is amazing.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |