 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignorancia org> wrote:
> Yes, much better... but I would make it even more clear. Also, what's
> the IOR of thomasite?
Have to pop it into the trusty Tom Swift gem-o-lyzer in the Flying Lab...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> Well, I wonder if with version 3.7 opal is not within reach. I seem to
> remember some striking examples a while ago here.
Samuel T. Benge made a nice bright opal with media and reflecting meshes inside
of an object.
Image -
http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.images/thread/%3C4aac43e1$1@news.povray.org%3E/
Source -
http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.scene-files/thread/%3C4aad7250@news.povray.org%3E/?ttop=403291&toff=150
Beware - it's slow...
Norbert
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 16-2-2016 20:06, Bald Eagle wrote:
> Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> wrote:
>
>> Yes, much better... but I would make it even more clear. Also, what's
>> the IOR of thomasite?
>
> Have to pop it into the trusty Tom Swift gem-o-lyzer in the Flying Lab...
>
>
Well, this being the only example of Thomasite in the world, I am happy
to say that its ior is 1.45. It is a rather cloudy gem so I cannot make
it clearer :-)
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2/16/2016 8:15 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 15-2-2016 15:43, Sven Littkowski wrote:
>> And now you need to give this image to a charming, wonderful woman of
>> your choice. :-D
>
> The woman I love does not need gems. ;-)
>
Because she has one. - You :-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2/16/2016 8:14 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 16-2-2016 8:35, Theogott wrote:
>> Gems are as nice theme, but the wheel on gems is already round.
>
> True, but I am just messing around and not interested in realism at all.
> This is thomasite ;-)
>
>>
>> The only Gem, nobody can render at this time is the OPAL.
>
> Well, I wonder if with version 3.7 opal is not within reach. I seem to
> remember some striking examples a while ago here.
>
Here is one from 2007 (I think).
It was made by the late Steve Paget. I asked him to make an opal ring
for my wife. He did this as well.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download '3_opals.jpg' (121 KB)
Preview of image '3_opals.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 17-2-2016 20:19, Stephen wrote:
> On 2/16/2016 8:15 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> On 15-2-2016 15:43, Sven Littkowski wrote:
>>> And now you need to give this image to a charming, wonderful woman of
>>> your choice. :-D
>>
>> The woman I love does not need gems. ;-)
>>
>
> Because she has one. - You :-)
>
>
Ooooooh....! 8-)
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 17-2-2016 20:24, Stephen wrote:
> Here is one from 2007 (I think).
> It was made by the late Steve Paget. I asked him to make an opal ring
> for my wife. He did this as well.
>
Yes indeed, I remember this one. I think Steve would have done an even
better job now with 3.7's irid improvements.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2/18/2016 8:03 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 17-2-2016 20:24, Stephen wrote:
>> Here is one from 2007 (I think).
>> It was made by the late Steve Paget. I asked him to make an opal ring
>> for my wife. He did this as well.
>>
>
> Yes indeed, I remember this one. I think Steve would have done an even
> better job now with 3.7's irid improvements.
>
I do too.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thats the best Opals i have ever seen being rendered, just what i expected from
one of the best (if not the best?) POV Artists out there, Jamie!
Great work.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
