 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I was just playing a bit with TopMod and got a nice gem geometry. I
could not resist...
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'transparencytest2.png' (602 KB)
Preview of image 'transparencytest2.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And now you need to give this image to a charming, wonderful woman of
your choice. :-D
-------------------------------------
On 15.02.2016 08:04, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> I was just playing a bit with TopMod and got a nice gem geometry. I
> could not resist...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I would use an underground of cut, polished rock material. Might look
even better again. But it is marvelous, as it is.
On 15.02.2016 08:04, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> I was just playing a bit with TopMod and got a nice gem geometry. I
> could not resist...
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gems are as nice theme, but the wheel on gems is already round.
If you go to youtube and type in rendering a diamond
you get things like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IuhHam3_uwY
I think this is how it should look. Ok, Octane is a commercial program, but if
we stay with Freeware, this one looks good:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebsXFEVwlWM
The only Gem, nobody can render at this time is the OPAL.
Diamonds, Ruby's etc. is just some sort of more or less coloured glas,
with another IOR and maybe a bit Dispersion ...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 16-2-2016 8:35, Theogott wrote:
> Gems are as nice theme, but the wheel on gems is already round.
True, but I am just messing around and not interested in realism at all.
This is thomasite ;-)
>
> The only Gem, nobody can render at this time is the OPAL.
Well, I wonder if with version 3.7 opal is not within reach. I seem to
remember some striking examples a while ago here.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 15-2-2016 15:43, Sven Littkowski wrote:
> And now you need to give this image to a charming, wonderful woman of
> your choice. :-D
The woman I love does not need gems. ;-)
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Well, I wonder if with version 3.7 opal is not within reach. I seem
> to remember some striking examples a while ago here.
Believe me... it's ******* difficult. I'm still regretting to have
taken the challenge Theo presented to me privately (well, at least it
served to get me poving again).
I tried a lot of things, but only got somewhat closer using multiple
emission medias. It still lacks some very distinctive features... and of
course, it's not animatable.
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'opal-ring-01.jpg' (105 KB)
Preview of image 'opal-ring-01.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 16-2-2016 10:48, Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
>> Well, I wonder if with version 3.7 opal is not within reach. I seem
>> to remember some striking examples a while ago here.
>
> Believe me... it's ******* difficult. I'm still regretting to have
> taken the challenge Theo presented to me privately (well, at least it
> served to get me poving again).
>
> I tried a lot of things, but only got somewhat closer using multiple
> emission medias. It still lacks some very distinctive features... and of
> course, it's not animatable.
>
Hmmm... I see what you mean indeed. Still, this is pretty good!
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Better I think.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'transparencytest2.png' (779 KB)
Preview of image 'transparencytest2.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
El 16/02/16 a las 14:17, Thomas de Groot escribió:
> Better I think.
>
Yes, much better... but I would make it even more clear. Also, what's
the IOR of thomasite?
--
jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
