 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi Povers,
for long time I wanted to use the Illusion code of Rune...
Here is my trial, based on my Materials project
(http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.scene-files/thread/%3Cweb.564e3a88b10641b17add5fa60%40news.povray.org%3E/).
It's based on using an image to build a scene out of the most easy
Anyway, look at the image...
Norbert Kern
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'easy_bricks.jpg' (839 KB)
Preview of image 'easy_bricks.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 19.11.2015 um 22:49 schrieb Norbert Kern:
> It's based on using an image to build a scene out of the most easy
>
> Anyway, look at the image...
I do - I definitely do!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11/19/2015 9:49 PM, Norbert Kern wrote:
> Hi Povers,
>
> for long time I wanted to use the Illusion code of Rune...
>
> Here is my trial, based on my Materials project
>
(http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.scene-files/thread/%3Cweb.564e3a88b10641b17add5fa60%40news.povray.org%3E/).
>
> It's based on using an image to build a scene out of the most easy
> LEGO™ brick using colors from an Official LEGO™ Color Chart.
>
I think you need smaller bricks. ;-)
It is really kind on the eyes. :-)
> Anyway, look at the image...
>
Ooh! 1960's psychedelia.
Magic! +1
> Norbert Kern
>
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
clipka <ano### [at] anonymous org> wrote:
> > Anyway, look at the image...
>
> I do - I definitely do!
I have to excuse the misuse of your fine code regarding the brick finish...
Is there a reason behind the misspelling of the LEGO writing?
Norbert Kern
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 19.11.2015 um 23:19 schrieb Norbert Kern:
> clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
>
>>> Anyway, look at the image...
>>
>> I do - I definitely do!
>
> I have to excuse the misuse of your fine code regarding the brick finish...
If that's misuse, then you're happily invited to misuse it more ;)
> Is there a reason behind the misspelling of the LEGO writing?
I must confess that honestly I have no idea what you're talking about.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ooooohh!
[sings] Puff, the Magic Dragon...
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> Ooh! 1960's psychedelia.
>
> Magic! +1
> Regards
> Stephen
Yeah - do you know the times - not as a child as I did?
Norbert
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> > clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> > I have to excuse the misuse of your fine code regarding the brick finish...
>
> If that's misuse, then you're happily invited to misuse it more ;)
>
> > Is there a reason behind the misspelling of the LEGO writing?
>
> I must confess that honestly I have no idea what you're talking about.
first point - perhaps I'll do it.
second point - sorry, I've to admit to not be able to find the correct source,
where the writing was LGEO - and not by chance! So I thougt, it would be a legal
thing or so...
Anyway - most probably it wasn't caused by you...
Norbert
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> Ooooohh!
>
> [sings] Puff, the Magic Dragon...
>
> Thomas
Oh, PPM - haven't heard them for thirty years...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11/20/2015 2:41 PM, Norbert Kern wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>
>> Ooh! 1960's psychedelia.
>>
>> Magic! +1
>
>> Regards
>> Stephen
>
> Yeah - do you know the times - not as a child as I did?
>
Yeah man! It was coming of age for me. ;-)
Long hair and the wacky backy. Would not have missed it, what I can
remember of it. ;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
