 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Getting back into POV with a practice render of my old robot. Enjoy!
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'scene3-multiple-robots.png' (784 KB)
Preview of image 'scene3-multiple-robots.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Alan Holding" <ala### [at] me com> wrote:
> Getting back into POV with a practice render of my old robot. Enjoy!
I love the poses of these robots. They look funny :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Alan Holding" <ala### [at] mecom> wrote:
> Getting back into POV with a practice render of my old robot. Enjoy!
These are great!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 23.07.2015 0:04, Alan Holding wrote:
> Getting back into POV with a practice render of my old robot. Enjoy!
Nice robots :)
Only thing that bothers me are the emissive eyes and chest plate,
they look a bit flat and artifical to me, especially with no surface
in range to give hint of being illuminated. Maybe the external surfaces
could be backlit by recessed lights instead to give a bit of structure
(e.g. with double_illuminate)?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> On 23.07.2015 0:04, Alan Holding wrote:
>
>> Getting back into POV with a practice render of my old robot. Enjoy!
>
> Nice robots :)
>
> Only thing that bothers me are the emissive eyes and chest plate,
> they look a bit flat and artifical to me, especially with no surface
> in range to give hint of being illuminated. Maybe the external surfaces
> could be backlit by recessed lights instead to give a bit of structure
> (e.g. with double_illuminate)?
>
Beter than double_illuminate: Backside illumination.
It's activated by providing a second value for the diffuse component of
the finish as follow:
diffuse 0.5 0.4
To keep the end result acurate, the summ of the two values should stay
less than 1. Part of the incident light is diffused back and another
part is duffused through the surface.
Alain
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 7/26/2015 8:38 PM, Alain wrote:
> Backside illumination.
I would pick a different phrase, If I were you. :-;
In British English "backside" is normally used for buttocks. :-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Alan Holding wrote on 23/07/2015 0.04:
> Getting back into POV with a practice render of my old robot. Enjoy!
>
Cool!
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 15-07-26 16:17, Stephen a écrit :
> On 7/26/2015 8:38 PM, Alain wrote:
>> Backside illumination.
>
> I would pick a different phrase, If I were you. :-;
> In British English "backside" is normally used for buttocks. :-)
>
It's the term used in the documentations.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 7/27/2015 10:09 PM, Alain wrote:
> Le 15-07-26 16:17, Stephen a écrit :
>> On 7/26/2015 8:38 PM, Alain wrote:
>>> Backside illumination.
>>
>> I would pick a different phrase, If I were you. :-;
>> In British English "backside" is normally used for buttocks. :-)
>>
>
> It's the term used in the documentations.
It still means bum to me. No mater the colour of your documentation. :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
> It still means bum to me. No mater the colour of your documentation. :)
"Maintenance! Looks like we've got a bum light over here. Let's see if we can
change that out."
:D
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
