 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 6/30/2015 5:09 PM, clipka wrote:
> Am 30.06.2015 um 17:29 schrieb Stephen:
>> On 6/30/2015 1:06 PM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>> For instance this.
>>
>> Nice! Now replace the plane with a large torus. :-)
>
> You're not planning to make Tom jump through a hoop, are you? ;)
>
No, I just want a smiley face for a new logo. :)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 30-6-2015 14:15, clipka wrote:
> Am 30.06.2015 um 14:06 schrieb Thomas de Groot:
>> On 30-6-2015 8:59, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>> On 29-6-2015 15:12, clipka wrote:
>>>> Am 29.06.2015 um 13:35 schrieb Thomas de Groot:
>>>>> Right. This should be it I guess:
>>>>
>>>> Now look at that! I /love/ the material shown on the left!
>>>>
>>>> Now you need to do something about the plane, because it /really/
>>>> breaks
>>>> the scene.
>>>
>>> It does. Maybe I shall do that...
>>
>> For instance this.
>
> Well, it's a bit of an improvement.
> A bit.
>
Well, I am not going any further. It is going beyond my initial
experimental intentions and I prefer to turn to other things.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degroot org> wrote:
> Well, I am not going any further. It is going beyond my initial
> experimental intentions and I prefer to turn to other things.
>
> --
> Thomas
It is good to see that you have improved your technique on this topic.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 1-7-2015 13:03, And wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>> Well, I am not going any further. It is going beyond my initial
>> experimental intentions and I prefer to turn to other things.
>>
>> --
>> Thomas
>
> It is good to see that you have improved your technique on this topic.
>
Oh yes! Which does not mean I shall follow it strictly from now on ;-)
I always give priority to artistic licence over real world properties.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> On 1-7-2015 13:03, And wrote:
> > Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> >> Well, I am not going any further. It is going beyond my initial
> >> experimental intentions and I prefer to turn to other things.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Thomas
> >
> > It is good to see that you have improved your technique on this topic.
> >
> Oh yes! Which does not mean I shall follow it strictly from now on ;-)
> I always give priority to artistic licence over real world properties.
>
> --
> Thomas
Hmm, I agree that it is not necessary always following it.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2-7-2015 3:10, And wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>> On 1-7-2015 13:03, And wrote:
>>> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>>>> Well, I am not going any further. It is going beyond my initial
>>>> experimental intentions and I prefer to turn to other things.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thomas
>>>
>>> It is good to see that you have improved your technique on this topic.
>>>
>> Oh yes! Which does not mean I shall follow it strictly from now on ;-)
>> I always give priority to artistic licence over real world properties.
>>
>> --
>> Thomas
>
> Hmm, I agree that it is not necessary always following it.
>
I consider ray-tracing like painting: it is a medium for (artistic)
expression regardless of its life-like possibilities. It also means
however that one needs to know the rules in order to be able to break
them ;-)
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> On 2-7-2015 3:10, And wrote:
> > Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> >> On 1-7-2015 13:03, And wrote:
> >>> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> >>>> Well, I am not going any further. It is going beyond my initial
> >>>> experimental intentions and I prefer to turn to other things.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Thomas
> >>>
> >>> It is good to see that you have improved your technique on this topic.
> >>>
> >> Oh yes! Which does not mean I shall follow it strictly from now on ;-)
> >> I always give priority to artistic licence over real world properties.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Thomas
> >
> > Hmm, I agree that it is not necessary always following it.
> >
>
> I consider ray-tracing like painting: it is a medium for (artistic)
> expression regardless of its life-like possibilities. It also means
> however that one needs to know the rules in order to be able to break
> them ;-)
>
> --
> Thomas
Sometimes I have the same idea, but it is come to me that even you don't express
it by a realism lighting, you still do something modeling, arrangement, ... in
an usually framework that express a life-like observation.
There are some other drawing style truly. For me, it is important to have the
ability of rendering realism first.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
These are some 'other style' pictures I ever enjoyed and downloaded:
http://yurinoboke.blogspot.tw/2011/01/hourou-musuko-wandering-son-episode-1.html
https://desingersinspiration.wordpress.com/tag/pascal-campion/
http://mclelun.deviantart.com/art/football-field-422808127
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 7/2/2015 2:57 PM, And wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>> On 2-7-2015 3:10, And wrote:
>>> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>>>> On 1-7-2015 13:03, And wrote:
>>>>> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>>>>>> Well, I am not going any further. It is going beyond my initial
>>>>>> experimental intentions and I prefer to turn to other things.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>
>>>>> It is good to see that you have improved your technique on this topic.
>>>>>
>>>> Oh yes! Which does not mean I shall follow it strictly from now on ;-)
>>>> I always give priority to artistic licence over real world properties.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thomas
>>>
>>> Hmm, I agree that it is not necessary always following it.
>>>
>>
>> I consider ray-tracing like painting: it is a medium for (artistic)
>> expression regardless of its life-like possibilities. It also means
>> however that one needs to know the rules in order to be able to break
>> them ;-)
>>
>> --
>> Thomas
>
> Sometimes I have the same idea, but it is come to me that even you don't express
> it by a realism lighting, you still do something modeling, arrangement, ... in
> an usually framework that express a life-like observation.
I think that you are trying to define art. :-)
> There are some other drawing style truly. For me, it is important to have the
> ability of rendering realism first.
>
If you like art. Don't let that become your only goal. If you know what
I mean. :-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 2-7-2015 16:28, And wrote:
> These are some 'other style' pictures I ever enjoyed and downloaded:
>
>
> http://yurinoboke.blogspot.tw/2011/01/hourou-musuko-wandering-son-episode-1.html
Indeed. I like this style too.
>
> https://desingersinspiration.wordpress.com/tag/pascal-campion/
> http://mclelun.deviantart.com/art/football-field-422808127
I have less affinity with this I'm afraid.
I am rather traditional in my preferences, as far as realism is concerned:
http://www.abcgallery.com/R/repin/repin.html
http://www.janmankes.nl/
http://www.helmantel.nl/
just to mention a few. Alternatively, I like abstract painting very much ;-)
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
