 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 26.06.2015 um 09:40 schrieb Thomas de Groot:
> diffuse albedo 0.0
> specular albedo 0.5
> roughness 0.001
> brilliance 3, 3
oh, btw, did I mention that brilliance has no effect if diffuse is set
to zero? :P
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 27/06/2015 15:41, clipka wrote:
> Am 26.06.2015 um 09:40 schrieb Thomas de Groot:
>
>> diffuse albedo 0.0
>> specular albedo 0.5
>> roughness 0.001
>> brilliance 3, 3
>
> oh, btw, did I mention that brilliance has no effect if diffuse is set
> to zero? :P
>
By the bye. We love the way the documentation is being handled, live. ;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 15-06-27 10:41, clipka a écrit :
> Am 26.06.2015 um 09:40 schrieb Thomas de Groot:
>
>> diffuse albedo 0.0
>> specular albedo 0.5
>> roughness 0.001
>> brilliance 3, 3
>
> oh, btw, did I mention that brilliance has no effect if diffuse is set
> to zero? :P
>
diffuse 0 mean that no light get diffused. brilliance controll how the
light get diffused. No light diffused = brilliance have no effect.
To me, it's self evident.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 27-6-2015 16:18, clipka wrote:
> Am 27.06.2015 um 14:12 schrieb Thomas de Groot:
>
>>> I'm pondering adding a mode where POV-Ray will automatically issue a
>>> warning whenever it finds inconsistencies in the settings.
>>>
>>> I guess I'll start every such warning message with "Thomas, I told
>>> you..." :P
>>>
>> Good idea! ;-)
>>
>> I have a problem reading from screen. Reason I never use e-books for
>> example.
>
> Then I'll have to make it an audible warning? :P
>
That would be better; add sirens because I don't hear too well :-)
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 27-6-2015 16:41, clipka wrote:
> Am 26.06.2015 um 09:40 schrieb Thomas de Groot:
>
>> diffuse albedo 0.0
>> specular albedo 0.5
>> roughness 0.001
>> brilliance 3, 3
>
> oh, btw, did I mention that brilliance has no effect if diffuse is set
> to zero? :P
>
As a matter of fact, you didn't.
I add it to the rules, as for somebody not familiar with physical
properties this is not evident.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 28-6-2015 1:33, Alain wrote:
> Le 15-06-27 10:41, clipka a écrit :
>> Am 26.06.2015 um 09:40 schrieb Thomas de Groot:
>>
>>> diffuse albedo 0.0
>>> specular albedo 0.5
>>> roughness 0.001
>>> brilliance 3, 3
>>
>> oh, btw, did I mention that brilliance has no effect if diffuse is set
>> to zero? :P
>>
>
> diffuse 0 mean that no light get diffused. brilliance controll how the
> light get diffused. No light diffused = brilliance have no effect.
> To me, it's self evident.
Not to me. Like many, I am a moron were physical properties are
concerned, hence the need for comprehensive rules. ;-)
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 27-6-2015 17:17, Stephen wrote:
> On 27/06/2015 15:41, clipka wrote:
>> Am 26.06.2015 um 09:40 schrieb Thomas de Groot:
>>
>>> diffuse albedo 0.0
>>> specular albedo 0.5
>>> roughness 0.001
>>> brilliance 3, 3
>>
>> oh, btw, did I mention that brilliance has no effect if diffuse is set
>> to zero? :P
>>
>
> By the bye. We love the way the documentation is being handled, live. ;-)
>
You mean like in a boxing ring? :-P
I think the documentation will get better as a result. I am compiling a
document from what Christoph is mumbling about; then I shall let him
read it and shall expect a bucket full of comments :-)
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 28/06/2015 07:58, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 27-6-2015 16:18, clipka wrote:
>> Am 27.06.2015 um 14:12 schrieb Thomas de Groot:
>>
>>>> I'm pondering adding a mode where POV-Ray will automatically issue a
>>>> warning whenever it finds inconsistencies in the settings.
>>>>
>>>> I guess I'll start every such warning message with "Thomas, I told
>>>> you..." :P
>>>>
>>> Good idea! ;-)
>>>
>>> I have a problem reading from screen. Reason I never use e-books for
>>> example.
>>
>> Then I'll have to make it an audible warning? :P
>>
> That would be better; add sirens because I don't hear too well :-)
>
Blinking text?
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 28/06/2015 08:08, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 27-6-2015 17:17, Stephen wrote:
>>
>> By the bye. We love the way the documentation is being handled, live. ;-)
>>
>
> You mean like in a boxing ring? :-P
>
No, like a dripping tap. One drop at a time. :-)
> I think the documentation will get better as a result. I am compiling a
> document from what Christoph is mumbling about; then I shall let him
> read it and shall expect a bucket full of comments :-)
>
Is Jim Holsenback still looking after the documentation? I've not seen
him post for a while.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 06/28/2015 06:22 AM, Stephen wrote:
> Blinking text?
No, no, NO! I will quit POV-Ray forever if Christoph does that!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
