hi all
this is my first attempt to recreate a marsh

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'canneto-12.jpg' (910 KB)

Preview of image 'canneto-12.jpg'

On 11-1-2015 16:24, eticre wrote:
> hi all
> this is my first attempt to recreate a marsh
>
Good start. The reeds look a bit too uniform and symmetric maybe, and 
your media needs some more samples (artefacts visible, or is the sun 
very low?)

-- 
Thomas

Post a reply to this message

Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> On 11-1-2015 16:24, eticre wrote:
> > hi all
> > this is my first attempt to recreate a marsh
> >
> Good start. The reeds look a bit too uniform and symmetric maybe, and
> your media needs some more samples (artefacts visible, or is the sun
> very low?)
>
> --
> Thomas

yes reds is only one object reused for too many times
i must create some others for making difference

media reworked

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'canneto-13.jpg' (480 KB)

Preview of image 'canneto-13.jpg'

> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>> On 11-1-2015 16:24, eticre wrote:
>>> hi all
>>> this is my first attempt to recreate a marsh
>>>
>> Good start. The reeds look a bit too uniform and symmetric maybe, and
>> your media needs some more samples (artefacts visible, or is the sun
>> very low?)
>>
>> --
>> Thomas
>
> yes reds is only one object reused for too many times
> i must create some others for making difference
>
> media reworked
>

Beter flowers beds. As for the reeds, in real life, they realy look like 
they are the same one cloned over and over.

Post a reply to this message

On 14-1-2015 2:45, Alain wrote:

>> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>>> On 11-1-2015 16:24, eticre wrote:
>>>> hi all
>>>> this is my first attempt to recreate a marsh
>>>>
>>> Good start. The reeds look a bit too uniform and symmetric maybe, and
>>> your media needs some more samples (artefacts visible, or is the sun
>>> very low?)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thomas
>>
>> yes reds is only one object reused for too many times
>> i must create some others for making difference
>>
>> media reworked
>>
>
> Beter flowers beds. As for the reeds, in real life, they realy look like
> they are the same one cloned over and over.

I think that what is needed for the reeds are more diverse leaves on 
each stalk.

-- 
Thomas

Post a reply to this message

> On 14-1-2015 2:45, Alain wrote:

>>> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>>>> On 11-1-2015 16:24, eticre wrote:
>>>>> hi all
>>>>> this is my first attempt to recreate a marsh
>>>>>
>>>> Good start. The reeds look a bit too uniform and symmetric maybe, and
>>>> your media needs some more samples (artefacts visible, or is the sun
>>>> very low?)
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thomas
>>>
>>> yes reds is only one object reused for too many times
>>> i must create some others for making difference
>>>
>>> media reworked
>>>
>>
>> Beter flowers beds. As for the reeds, in real life, they realy look like
>> they are the same one cloned over and over.
>
> I think that what is needed for the reeds are more diverse leaves on
> each stalk.
>

You're right on that point. Larger in the low part groing smaller toward 
the top.

Post a reply to this message

reds reworked

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 't.jpg' (1057 KB)

Preview of image 't.jpg'

"eticre" <eti### [at] tinit> wrote:
> reds reworked

grass and yellow flower reworked

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'canneto-15.jpg' (1008 KB)

Preview of image 'canneto-15.jpg'

"eticre" <eti### [at] tinit> wrote:
> "eticre" <eti### [at] tinit> wrote:
> > reds reworked
>
> grass and yellow flower reworked

very pretty.

Have you thought of using a little focal blur?

Regards,
A.D.B.

Post a reply to this message

"Anthony D. Baye" <Sha### [at] spamnomorehotmailcom> wrote:
> "eticre" <eti### [at] tinit> wrote:
> > "eticre" <eti### [at] tinit> wrote:
> > > reds reworked
> >
> > grass and yellow flower reworked
>
> very pretty.
>
> Have you thought of using a little focal blur?
>
> Regards,
> A.D.B.
tried with aperture 0.1 samples=100 confidence=0.8 variance=0.0001 but I m not
satiffied and render time has ballooned

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'canneto16.jpg' (925 KB)

Preview of image 'canneto16.jpg'