On 12-1-2015 7:24, And wrote:

> I like this. the method which combines two functions looks useful.
>
> It seems there are a lot of techniques on building functions.
>
>
You should look up my Geomorph macros! ;-) The functions are so complex 
that the the whole thing is hardly usable.

-- 
Thomas

Post a reply to this message

On 11-1-2015 16:56, Christian Froeschlin wrote:
> On 11.01.2015 13:35, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> But this has better potential (see image) using as function:
>
> nice. you can also add some turbulence by adding a noise term
> to the input parameters of the functions, e.g.
>
>    f_waves(x*100 + f_bozo(x*100,0,0),
>            y*10  + f_bozo(0,y*10,0),
>            z*100 + f_bozo(0,0,z*100))
>
> (offline sample, scaling likely way off)
>
>
Ah yes, thanks indeed! I wanted to add turbulence by adding another 
function but that did not work correctly. This is more logical.

-- 
Thomas

Post a reply to this message

Thomas de Groot wrote on 11/01/2015 13.35:
> But this has better potential (see image) using as function:
>
> function(x,y,z) {
>      0.8
>    - f_crackle(400*x, 400*y, 400*z)
>    + f_bozo(x*100, y*100, z*100)
>    - f_waves(x*100, y*10, z*100)
> }
>
> Thomas
Nice. with a different texture could be used for a plower field too.
Paolo

Post a reply to this message

On 12-1-2015 11:39, Paolo Gibellini wrote:
> Nice. with a different texture could be used for a plower field too.
> Paolo
Yes indeed. Something to keep in mind :-)

-- 
Thomas

Post a reply to this message