![](/i/fill.gif) |
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
That's looking really good, Thomas.
I think that having some of the leaves partially covered in water or sand adds a
degree of realism, especially since the tire tracks imply disturbed ground.
Have you thought about placing your leaves like a tripod, using a 3-point
orientation method? That might help get them to lay correctly.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Le 14-12-27 07:10, Thomas de Groot a écrit :
> Better but still not perfect. The control of the leaf orientation is
> tricky especially were there are sudden jumps in the height_field. For
> trace() I use a more basic/smooth height_field and calculate the
> orientation from two points but still the transformations are not equal
> for all leaves.
>
> Thomas
>
For the few leaves that still intersect with the ground, it looks
somewhat like there are holes/breakages in them, whitch is normal and
add some credibility.
Alain
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 27-12-2014 17:23, Bald Eagle wrote:
> That's looking really good, Thomas.
Thank you indeed.
>
> I think that having some of the leaves partially covered in water or sand adds a
> degree of realism, especially since the tire tracks imply disturbed ground.
Yes, that was also my judgement :-)
>
> Have you thought about placing your leaves like a tripod, using a 3-point
> orientation method? That might help get them to lay correctly.
Out of laziness I must confess I did not use three point, only two and I
agree that I should do that. In addition to a few other things that is
going to be my next step.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 27-12-2014 21:17, Alain wrote:
> For the few leaves that still intersect with the ground, it looks
> somewhat like there are holes/breakages in them, whitch is normal and
> add some credibility.
Indeed. I am not too concerned about them presently. Still, I shall seek
some improvements.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Now, with a couple of additions, the meaning of the scene completely
changes.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'puddle_06.jpg' (226 KB)
Preview of image 'puddle_06.jpg'
![puddle_06.jpg](/povray.binaries.images/attachment/%3C54a2967e%40news.povray.org%3E/puddle_06.jpg?ttop=413793&toff=300&preview=1)
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 12/30/2014 07:11 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> Now, with a couple of additions, the meaning of the scene completely
> changes.
>
Clever idea & neatly done! I'll have to let my daughter know her puddle
snapshot has led to another Pov-Ray image. :-)
Bill P.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
| ![](/i/fill.gif) |