|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> Better than I thought, with a slightly curly hair (same as previous) but
> longer, and in an unkempt, rough fashion.
>
> Thomas
Nice. Since you're taking requests, give the guy a porn-style mustache
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11-10-2014 16:21, jhu wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>> Better than I thought, with a slightly curly hair (same as previous) but
>> longer, and in an unkempt, rough fashion.
>>
>> Thomas
>
> Nice. Since you're taking requests, give the guy a porn-style mustache
>
Now, what may that be...?
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi(gh)!
On 11.10.2014 14:02, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> Better than I thought, with a slightly curly hair (same as previous) but
> longer, and in an unkempt, rough fashion.
>
> Thomas
Real beard hair (in most men) would be coarser, more like wire (at least
my beard looks that way)... this guy's is too fluffy!
See you in Khyberspace!
Yadgar
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 14-10-11 08:02, Thomas de Groot a écrit :
> Better than I thought, with a slightly curly hair (same as previous) but
> longer, and in an unkempt, rough fashion.
>
> Thomas
Looking at my own beard, the edge on the sheeks is WAY to deffined.
Beards usualy don't stop at a well deffined line.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> On 11-10-2014 16:21, jhu wrote:
> > Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> >> Better than I thought, with a slightly curly hair (same as previous) but
> >> longer, and in an unkempt, rough fashion.
> >>
> >> Thomas
> >
> > Nice. Since you're taking requests, give the guy a porn-style mustache
> >
>
> Now, what may that be...?
>
> Thomas
http://www.cracked.com/blog/a-guide-to-the-modern-moustache/
I think it's #6.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 11.10.2014 14:02, schrieb Thomas de Groot:
> Better than I thought, with a slightly curly hair (same as previous) but
> longer, and in an unkempt, rough fashion.
Is that with aid of Poser or without?
Might need a beard for some client of mine soon.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12-10-2014 3:30, clipka wrote:
> Am 11.10.2014 14:02, schrieb Thomas de Groot:
>> Better than I thought, with a slightly curly hair (same as previous) but
>> longer, and in an unkempt, rough fashion.
>
> Is that with aid of Poser or without?
>
> Might need a beard for some client of mine soon.
>
Without Poser.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11-10-2014 20:09, Jörg 'Yadgar' Bleimann wrote:
> Hi(gh)!
>
> On 11.10.2014 14:02, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> Better than I thought, with a slightly curly hair (same as previous) but
>> longer, and in an unkempt, rough fashion.
>>
>> Thomas
>
> Real beard hair (in most men) would be coarser, more like wire (at least
> my beard looks that way)... this guy's is too fluffy!
My own beard is coarser too indeed :-)
I am messing around presently. It is all a matter of finding the correct
length/diameter ratio. If I increase the diameter too much in this
example, the hairs look like a bunch of deformed cones and loose their
hair-like aspect.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12-10-2014 1:54, jhu wrote:
> http://www.cracked.com/blog/a-guide-to-the-modern-moustache/
>
> I think it's #6.
>
LOL
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 11-10-2014 22:34, Alain wrote:
> Le 14-10-11 08:02, Thomas de Groot a écrit :
>> Better than I thought, with a slightly curly hair (same as previous) but
>> longer, and in an unkempt, rough fashion.
>>
>> Thomas
>
> Looking at my own beard, the edge on the sheeks is WAY to deffined.
> Beards usualy don't stop at a well deffined line.
True. Only when the cheeks are shaven ;-)
I am bound by the 'beard cap' provided by Poser. Alternative is to make
my own beard cap which covers also the cheeks. Possible, but a bit more
work. Presently, it is the concept I am exploring.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |