 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
At first view, a piece of modern architecture invading an ancient one.
However.
Two versions of the Cloister are mixed her. The normal one from all
preceding images, and a version where Poseray only converted the
bounding boxes of the model. No subsequent transformations have been
applied to both models and yet, the bounding boxes seem to be shifted
along the z-axis by a certain value. I cannot explain this, maybe FlyerX
can?
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'silentium_test.png' (307 KB)
Preview of image 'silentium_test.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 25/09/2014 15:32, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> At first view, a piece of modern architecture invading an ancient one.
>
> However.
>
> Two versions of the Cloister are mixed her. The normal one from all
> preceding images, and a version where Poseray only converted the
> bounding boxes of the model. No subsequent transformations have been
> applied to both models and yet, the bounding boxes seem to be shifted
> along the z-axis by a certain value. I cannot explain this, maybe FlyerX
> can?
>
> Thomas
Would it take long to do it viewing straight at the shift, maybe with a
ruler in view? That might give you an idea.
You might have introduced an offset in one of the scale and or transform
coefficients before you saved the geometry file.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 25-9-2014 17:47, Stephen wrote:
> Would it take long to do it viewing straight at the shift, maybe with a
> ruler in view? That might give you an idea.
> You might have introduced an offset in one of the scale and or transform
> coefficients before you saved the geometry file.
>
I am going to sniff around indeed but both versions are coming out
straight from Poseray without any further transformations... But it
probably will turn out I am wrong ;-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
There definitely is a problem with Poseray. When the group of objects is
assymmetrical around the origin, the bounding boxes of the simplified
geometry are shifted.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'silentium_test.png' (372 KB)
Preview of image 'silentium_test.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degroot org> wrote:
> There definitely is a problem with Poseray. When the group of objects is
> assymmetrical around the origin, the bounding boxes of the simplified
> geometry are shifted.
Could it be a left-handed/right-handed mix-up?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 26-9-2014 12:53, Cousin Ricky wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>> There definitely is a problem with Poseray. When the group of objects is
>> assymmetrical around the origin, the bounding boxes of the simplified
>> geometry are shifted.
>
> Could it be a left-handed/right-handed mix-up?
It shouldn't be as the the two conversions are based on the same
original model as read in Poseray. Note also the shifting to the right
for the big sphere and to the left for the two cubes in the back while
the small sphere seems all right.
I include the test files so you can try them. Just include them in a scene.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'windows-1252' (48 KB)
Download 'windows-1252' (9 KB)
Download 'windows-1252' (3 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From another angle, all objects are visibly shifted differently...
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'silentium_test.png' (459 KB)
Preview of image 'silentium_test.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 26-9-2014 12:53, Cousin Ricky wrote:
> Could it be a left-handed/right-handed mix-up?
Got it indeed. Scale the simplified geometry: scale <-1,1,1>
You were indeed right.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'silentium_test.png' (470 KB)
Preview of image 'silentium_test.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
