 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I was struggling with what to do with these gargoyles until Thomas'
recent post got me going on the courtyard idea. There's still some work
to do but (in the meantime) I was exploring different views and I
thought this one was worth a beauty run and posting the results.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'work.png' (2632 KB)
Preview of image 'work.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I was struggling with what to do with these gargoyles until Thomas'
> recent post got me going on the courtyard idea. There's still some work
> to do but (in the meantime) I was exploring different views and I
> thought this one was worth a beauty run and posting the results.
Nice! Are all abjects Povrayed? Or 3d models?
Lionel--
Do not judge my words, judge my actions.
---
http://www.avast.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 09/23/2014 01:28 PM, FractRacer wrote:
>> I was struggling with what to do with these gargoyles until Thomas'
>> recent post got me going on the courtyard idea. There's still some work
>> to do but (in the meantime) I was exploring different views and I
>> thought this one was worth a beauty run and posting the results.
>
> Nice! Are all abjects Povrayed? Or 3d models?
thanks ... the column capitals and gargoyles are models ... the gargoyle
was in ply format and i used ply2pov tools that Le_Forgeron posted some
time ago to convert it ...to mesh2. the center part of the columns and
the rest of the building elements are pov csg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 23-9-2014 19:15, James Holsenback wrote:
> I was struggling with what to do with these gargoyles until Thomas'
> recent post got me going on the courtyard idea. There's still some work
> to do but (in the meantime) I was exploring different views and I
> thought this one was worth a beauty run and posting the results.
I love it! There is potential for some dramatic lighting.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 09/24/2014 03:55 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 23-9-2014 19:15, James Holsenback wrote:
>> I was struggling with what to do with these gargoyles until Thomas'
>> recent post got me going on the courtyard idea. There's still some work
>> to do but (in the meantime) I was exploring different views and I
>> thought this one was worth a beauty run and posting the results.
>
> I love it! There is potential for some dramatic lighting.
Thanks ... I'm thinking of opening up the back of the alcove to try
back-lighting and media
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 23/09/2014 19:25, James Holsenback wrote:
> the center part of the columns and the rest of the building elements are
> pov csg
That's good because the Centre part of the columns look too thin for
their base, to me.
But as a whole a very nice image and textures. :-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
James Holsenback <nom### [at] none com> wrote:
> I was struggling with what to do with these gargoyles until Thomas'
> recent post got me going on the courtyard idea. There's still some work
> to do but (in the meantime) I was exploring different views and I
> thought this one was worth a beauty run and posting the results.
Plenty of things to do with gargoyles the problem is they all involve lots of
time consuming modelling. This is good and the columns are pretty good CSG as
well, a good job with the normals, I was trying to workout if it was just
normals or some isosurfaces in there?
Sean
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 09/24/2014 03:55 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 23-9-2014 19:15, James Holsenback wrote:
>> I was struggling with what to do with these gargoyles until Thomas'
>> recent post got me going on the courtyard idea. There's still some work
>> to do but (in the meantime) I was exploring different views and I
>> thought this one was worth a beauty run and posting the results.
>
> I love it! There is potential for some dramatic lighting.
indeed ...
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'work.png' (2024 KB)
Preview of image 'work.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 9-10-2014 21:43, James Holsenback wrote:
> On 09/24/2014 03:55 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> I love it! There is potential for some dramatic lighting.
>
> indeed ...
Absolutely. The lighting is just right. An alternative could be a light
from a fire: variations of light intensity across the scene.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10/09/2014 03:43 PM, James Holsenback wrote:
> On 09/24/2014 03:55 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> On 23-9-2014 19:15, James Holsenback wrote:
>>> I was struggling with what to do with these gargoyles until Thomas'
>>> recent post got me going on the courtyard idea. There's still some work
>>> to do but (in the meantime) I was exploring different views and I
>>> thought this one was worth a beauty run and posting the results.
>>
>> I love it! There is potential for some dramatic lighting.
>
> indeed ...
Very nice.
Bill P.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
