|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mixing the background of cgsphere with tinachep's theme: star (single)
> http://www.tc-rtc.co.uk/index/index.html
> http://www.cgsphere.com/
Kepler-Poinsot: small stellated dodecahedron.
(in French: petit dodécaèdre étoilé)
I kept inside the icosahedron delimited by the planes, and the IOR is
limited so far to 1.1 to have a tainted shadow (higher value gives a
blacker shadow).
The theme limits to one star, but should I add an icosahedron and a
dodecahedron on the sides ?
Other suggestions are welcome too.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'yellow.jpg' (240 KB)
Preview of image 'yellow.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 28/12/2013 9:27 AM, Le_Forgeron wrote:
> The theme limits to one star, but should I add an icosahedron and a
> dodecahedron on the sides ?
The theme is there to stimulate your imagination. And I like what it has
done so far. :-)
Why not add the 'ahedrons and see what it looks like?
> Other suggestions are welcome too.
Facets and more facets. ;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 28-12-2013 10:27, Le_Forgeron wrote:
> Mixing the background of cgsphere with tinachep's theme: star (single)
>
>> http://www.tc-rtc.co.uk/index/index.html
>
>> http://www.cgsphere.com/
>
> Kepler-Poinsot: small stellated dodecahedron.
> (in French: petit dodécaèdre étoilé)
>
> I kept inside the icosahedron delimited by the planes, and the IOR is
> limited so far to 1.1 to have a tainted shadow (higher value gives a
> blacker shadow).
Is that your face I see in the centre of the star? ;-)
>
> The theme limits to one star, but should I add an icosahedron and a
> dodecahedron on the sides ?
> Other suggestions are welcome too.
>
Star it is, but it may be one amongst many for instance. Feel free to
experiment within and without the boundaries of the challenge.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 28/12/2013 11:03, Stephen nous fit lire :
> On 28/12/2013 9:27 AM, Le_Forgeron wrote:
>> The theme limits to one star, but should I add an icosahedron and a
>> dodecahedron on the sides ?
>
> The theme is there to stimulate your imagination. And I like what it has
> done so far. :-)
> Why not add the 'ahedrons and see what it looks like?
>
>> Other suggestions are welcome too.
>
> Facets and more facets. ;-)
>
>
More facets, indeed... at +Q3 it is fast.
I was to use glass, but I wonder if metal would not be as lovely... well
more renders to perform, I guess.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'q3.jpg' (165 KB)
Preview of image 'q3.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 28/12/2013 2:57 PM, Le_Forgeron wrote:
> Le 28/12/2013 11:03, Stephen nous fit lire :
>> On 28/12/2013 9:27 AM, Le_Forgeron wrote:
>>> The theme limits to one star, but should I add an icosahedron and a
>>> dodecahedron on the sides ?
>>
>> The theme is there to stimulate your imagination. And I like what it has
>> done so far. :-)
>> Why not add the 'ahedrons and see what it looks like?
>>
>>> Other suggestions are welcome too.
>>
>> Facets and more facets. ;-)
>>
>>
> More facets, indeed... at +Q3 it is fast.
>
You call that More? ;-)
Interesting shape, though.
> I was to use glass, but I wonder if metal would not be as lovely... well
> more renders to perform, I guess.
>
Picasso, springs to mind.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12/28/2013 04:27 AM, Le_Forgeron wrote:
> Mixing the background of cgsphere with tinachep's theme: star (single)
>
>> http://www.tc-rtc.co.uk/index/index.html
>
>> http://www.cgsphere.com/
>
> Kepler-Poinsot: small stellated dodecahedron.
> (in French: petit dodécaèdre étoilé)
>
> I kept inside the icosahedron delimited by the planes, and the IOR is
> limited so far to 1.1 to have a tainted shadow (higher value gives a
> blacker shadow).
>
> The theme limits to one star, but should I add an icosahedron and a
> dodecahedron on the sides ?
> Other suggestions are welcome too.
>
I really like this.
I'm a fan of patterns and shadows and so vote for a few more lights
perhaps with the shadows crawling up the background behind the object.
Bill P.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |