 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The other day I was goofing around with some of the example images that come
with the povray install and I ran into this one again.
Running the original takes about 3 seconds on my machine, but after tweaking
it a bit, it took 7 hours, 29 mins, 59 secs.
--
Ger
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'ntreal.jpeg.jpg' (140 KB)
Preview of image 'ntreal.jpeg.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ger <ger### [at] gmail com> wrote:
> The other day I was goofing around with some of the example images that come
> with the povray install and I ran into this one again.
> Running the original takes about 3 seconds on my machine, but after tweaking
> it a bit, it took 7 hours, 29 mins, 59 secs.
>
That is okay. :-D
I've got a Police box if you want to put it in the background. ;-)
Or a knight on a rearing horse. ;-)
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ger <ger### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> The other day I was goofing around with some of the example images that come
> with the povray install and I ran into this one again.
> Running the original takes about 3 seconds on my machine, but after tweaking
> it a bit, it took 7 hours, 29 mins, 59 secs.
>
>
> --
> Ger
That is some improvement in speed you have there ;-)
I remember running this scene on my 386 when I first got POV, I cannot remember
exactly but it probably took several hours (maybe even days).
Has made me think though, this would be a good competition idea, who could
improve/rework one of the old standard scenes (fish13 was always one of my
favourites).
Sean
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12/18/2013 10:08 PM, Ger wrote:
> The other day I was goofing around with some of the example images that come
> with the povray install and I ran into this one again.
> Running the original takes about 3 seconds on my machine, but after tweaking
> it a bit, it took 7 hours, 29 mins, 59 secs.
>
>
:-) Those of us around a long time all secretly miss those long, long
render times on the old scenes...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
William F Pokorny <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> On 12/18/2013 10:08 PM, Ger wrote:
> > The other day I was goofing around with some of the example images that come
> > with the povray install and I ran into this one again.
> > Running the original takes about 3 seconds on my machine, but after tweaking
> > it a bit, it took 7 hours, 29 mins, 59 secs.
> >
> >
> :-) Those of us around a long time all secretly miss those long, long
> render times on the old scenes...
We do?
Oh! we do. ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi(gh)!
On 19.12.2013 12:28, William F Pokorny wrote:
> :-) Those of us around a long time all secretly miss those long, long
> render times on the old scenes...
Not really... if computer technology would catastrophically collapse
back to the level of the early 1990s, I would find myself sitting at a
486-40DX with 4 megs of RAM and 210 megs of harddisk and thus, with the
POV-Ray experience of the last 18 years I probably would give up
raytracing entirely (not to speak of realtime 3-D) and refrain to
building Khyberspace as a text-based MUD world...
See you in Khyberspace!
Yadgar
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
