 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Based on idea submitted here by Ger Remmers (Ger).
Using a mesh.
It has the earth radius, but the altitude is over-amplified (500km of
max depth)
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'planete.png' (522 KB)
Download 'eckert_6.png' (1453 KB)
Preview of image 'planete.png'
Preview of image 'eckert_6.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 08/25/2013 09:40 AM, Le_Forgeron wrote:
> Based on idea submitted here by Ger Remmers (Ger).
>
> Using a mesh.
>
> It has the earth radius, but the altitude is over-amplified (500km of
> max depth)
>
Nice.
How many points did you use on the sphere?
--
Cheers
Ger
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Le 25/08/2013 19:05, Ger nous fit lire :
> On 08/25/2013 09:40 AM, Le_Forgeron wrote:
>> Based on idea submitted here by Ger Remmers (Ger).
>>
>> Using a mesh.
>>
>> It has the earth radius, but the altitude is over-amplified (500km of
>> max depth)
>>
> Nice.
>
> How many points did you use on the sphere?
>
Far too much for the final resolution;
716268 vertices, 1432532 triangles.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 25-8-2013 21:38, Le_Forgeron wrote:
> Le 25/08/2013 19:05, Ger nous fit lire :
>> How many points did you use on the sphere?
>>
> Far too much for the final resolution;
>
> 716268 vertices, 1432532 triangles.
>
Maybe, but that makes it possible to navigate a low orbit ;-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Le_Forgeron on date 25/08/2013 16.40 wrote:
> Based on idea submitted here by Ger Remmers (Ger).
>
> Using a mesh.
>
> It has the earth radius, but the altitude is over-amplified (500km of
> max depth)
>
It's a very good result imho.
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
