 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I think I have reached the final version of this image.
What do you think?
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'elements of geology3_final.jpg' (273 KB)
Preview of image 'elements of geology3_final.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10/06/2013 11:47 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> I think I have reached the final version of this image.
>
> What do you think?
>
Pretty good. :-D
A little nitpick. Does the Poser model have hair?
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10-6-2013 13:18, Stephen wrote:
> Pretty good. :-D
Thanks!
>
> A little nitpick. Does the Poser model have hair?
LOL Yes it has, although close cropped. ;-)
Now that you have found the weak spot of the image, I am obliged to add
some 19th century /coiffure/...
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10-6-2013 13:18, Stephen wrote:
> A little nitpick. Does the Poser model have hair?
This is probably more to your liking ;-)
Added a white collar too.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'elements of geology3.jpg' (5 KB)
Preview of image 'elements of geology3.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10/06/2013 12:51 PM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> LOL Yes it has, although close cropped. ;-)
>
> Now that you have found the weak spot of the image, I am obliged to add
> some 19th century /coiffure/...
Just some fuzz at the back and sideburns would do, I think.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10/06/2013 1:35 PM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 10-6-2013 13:18, Stephen wrote:
>> A little nitpick. Does the Poser model have hair?
>
> This is probably more to your liking ;-)
>
> Added a white collar too.
>
Indeed it is. :-D
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10-6-2013 15:02, Stephen wrote:
> Just some fuzz at the back and sideburns would do, I think.
>
The sideburns would be nice indeed for a close up. I need to model that
separately...
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degroot org> wrote:
> On 10-6-2013 15:02, Stephen wrote:
> > Just some fuzz at the back and sideburns would do, I think.
> >
>
> The sideburns would be nice indeed for a close up. I need to model that
> separately...
>
> Thomas
I thought he was bald
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10-6-2013 23:22, BertvdB wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>> On 10-6-2013 15:02, Stephen wrote:
>>> Just some fuzz at the back and sideburns would do, I think.
>>>
>>
>> The sideburns would be nice indeed for a close up. I need to model that
>> separately...
>>
>> Thomas
>
> I thought he was bald
>
Oh no. Not at all. A simple follicle. :-)
Size and shadow of the hat rim made it invisible. However, I had delayed
proper attention to the hair until later. The problem with the
combination of hair and hat is that you have to tweak both until nothing
is poking through and still look acceptable.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> I think I have reached the final version of this image.
>
> What do you think?
I really like it. The clouds are very effective, the birds add life, and the
landscape is spectacular. I honestly didn't spot the issue with the facial
furniture :)
Bill
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
