 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This one is about Deep Time, i.e. the ages needed for sedimentation -
uplift - erosion.
The Victorian gentleman, obviously is Charles Lyell.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'elements of geology3_04.png' (556 KB)
Preview of image 'elements of geology3_04.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degroot org> wrote:
> This one is about Deep Time, i.e. the ages needed for sedimentation -
> uplift - erosion.
>
> The Victorian gentleman, obviously is Charles Lyell.
>
> Thomas
Hi Thomas,
Nice composition on this one, for me the grass in the foreground would be better
if real grass (I am guessing it is just a texture currently?)
Also, I think the grass in the distance is too bright/green.
I assume the fog is media? If not I would be interested to see your settings as
I never have much luck at getting a good turbulent ground fog using the fog
statement.
Sean
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3-6-2013 1:49, s.day wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> Nice composition on this one, for me the grass in the foreground would be better
> if real grass (I am guessing it is just a texture currently?)
You are absolutely right. This image is not the final version, and the
foreground will also show some trees.
>
> Also, I think the grass in the distance is too bright/green.
Yes, I believe so too.
>
> I assume the fog is media? If not I would be interested to see your settings as
> I never have much luck at getting a good turbulent ground fog using the fog
> statement.
This is indeed a media. Neither could I indeed get a good enough
turbulent ground fog. It always looks too splotchy. Media does a much
better job.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Thomas de Groot on date 02/06/2013 14.19 wrote:
> This one is about Deep Time, i.e. the ages needed for sedimentation -
> uplift - erosion.
>
> The Victorian gentleman, obviously is Charles Lyell.
>
> Thomas
A very nice scene.
Could be interesting trying a render in sepia tones?
;-)
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And a new version.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'elements of geology3_05.png' (639 KB)
Preview of image 'elements of geology3_05.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3-6-2013 9:58, Paolo Gibellini wrote:
> A very nice scene.
> Could be interesting trying a render in sepia tones?
Yes, certainly. As a post-processing product here... ;-)
As a render, I would add other things, like scratches, stains, faded
areas... I shall look into this.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'elements of geology3_05_sepia.png' (527 KB)
Preview of image 'elements of geology3_05_sepia.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Thomas de Groot on date 03/06/2013 13.22 wrote:
> As a render, I would add other things, like scratches, stains, faded
> areas... I shall look into this.
>
> Thomas
>
>
Hey, stop post here old daguerreotypes!
;-)
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 3-6-2013 15:55, Paolo Gibellini wrote:
> Hey, stop post here old daguerreotypes!
> ;-)
<grin> Still, that would be a nice idea... I think I shall follow up
that hint...
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 03/06/13 12:14, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> And a new version.
>
> Thomas
>
...and the original photograph ;-D
John
--
The level of my sarcasm depends upon the level of your stupidity
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 03/06/13 18:58, Doctor John wrote:
> On 03/06/13 12:14, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> And a new version.
>>
>> Thomas
>>
> ....and the original photograph ;-D
>
> John
>
Oops! Forgot the attachment. Mea culpa
John
--
The level of my sarcasm depends upon the level of your stupidity
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'tdg.png' (358 KB)
Preview of image 'tdg.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
