 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: See: povray.beta-test: REquesting user feedback: POV-Ray v3.7 scenes/includes
Date: 26 Feb 2013 10:58:03
Message: <512cdb8b@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 25-2-2013 9:58, Paolo Gibellini wrote:
> Ok. It _should_ be included in next release!
> Provided with the comments obviously.
> Paolo
How about this?
Just developed it today as a variant to my current modelling. Can be
expanded.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'urbanism2_test.png' (403 KB)
Preview of image 'urbanism2_test.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: See: povray.beta-test: REquesting user feedback: POV-Ray v3.7 scenes/includes
Date: 27 Feb 2013 04:24:43
Message: <512dd0db@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This would be a better controlled random urbanism, with the exception of
the cut-offs at the block edges.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'urbanism2_test.png' (417 KB)
Preview of image 'urbanism2_test.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: See: povray.beta-test: Requesting user feedback: POV-Ray v3.7 scenes/includes
Date: 27 Feb 2013 04:31:44
Message: <512dd280@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Without the cut-offs (defining the street boundaries) the house blocks
look better, but the streets would be much more irregular...
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'urbanism2_test.png' (421 KB)
Preview of image 'urbanism2_test.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: See: povray.beta-test: REquesting user feedback: POV-Ray v3.7 scenes/includes
Date: 27 Feb 2013 08:15:09
Message: <512e06dd@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Finally: with some better control on intersecting terrace walls.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'urbanism2_test.png' (413 KB)
Preview of image 'urbanism2_test.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Paolo Gibellini
Subject: Re: See: povray.beta-test: REquesting user feedback: POV-Ray v3.7 scenes/includes
Date: 27 Feb 2013 10:16:59
Message: <512e236b$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Thomas de Groot on date 26/02/2013 16.57 wrote:
> On 25-2-2013 9:58, Paolo Gibellini wrote:
> > Ok. It _should_ be included in next release!
> > Provided with the comments obviously.
> > Paolo
>
> How about this?
>
> Just developed it today as a variant to my current modelling. Can be
> expanded.
>
> Thomas
As a city, I like it (perhaps it could be expanded by adding some
openings to emulate windows and doors).
As a dump of your brain, it is in any case interesting...
;-)
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: See: povray.beta-test: REquesting user feedback: POV-Ray v3.7scenes/includes
Date: 27 Feb 2013 11:01:25
Message: <512e2dd5$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 27-2-2013 16:16, Paolo Gibellini wrote:
> As a city, I like it (perhaps it could be expanded by adding some
> openings to emulate windows and doors).
There is room for expansion of course, and I shall implement this also
in Gancaloon proper.
> As a dump of your brain, it is in any case interesting...
Indeed. :-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nice, very interesting...
But I see two floating domes not affixed to a roof: one one the left side and
one just right of the middle...
Nevertheless, nice work.
Greetings
Karl
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degroot org> wrote:
> Finally: with some better control on intersecting terrace walls.
Nice work! It looks so much like a city center in the Middle East somewhere,
very dense. And has that 'haphazard' look of decades of construction, one
building on top of the other, when building space it at a premium.
If this 'city builder' code is what you have in mind for contributing to
POV-Ray's include files, I vote YES.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: See: povray.beta-test: REquesting user feedback: POV-Ray v3.7scenes/inc=
Date: 28 Feb 2013 02:58:50
Message: <512f0e3a$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 27-2-2013 21:43, Karl Anders wrote:
> Nice, very interesting...
>
> But I see two floating domes not affixed to a roof: one one the left side and
> one just right of the middle...
Good spotting! That is the result of an incomplete difference. The domes
are not floating but partially cut off at their base. Easy to correct;
however, that will result in incomplete domes. The consequence of this
incremental city building.
>
> Nevertheless, nice work.
Thanks.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: See: povray.beta-test: REquesting user feedback: POV-Ray v3.7 scenes/in=
Date: 28 Feb 2013 03:09:00
Message: <512f109c@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 28-2-2013 6:36, Kenneth wrote:
> Nice work! It looks so much like a city center in the Middle East somewhere,
> very dense. And has that 'haphazard' look of decades of construction, one
> building on top of the other, when building space it at a premium.
Thanks. That was indeed my intention. Quite by chance I saw a photograph
of Ghadames in Libya in the National Geographic the other day, which
looked much like this. You can also Google Earth to there to have a look ;-)
>
> If this 'city builder' code is what you have in mind for contributing to
> POV-Ray's include files, I vote YES.
Well, I wrote this code as an answer to Paolo, just for fun really, and
because I suddenly I got an idea about how to solve a long-standing
puzzle for me. However, if the POV bosses above us feel inclined to add
this to the scenes collection, I can prepare a proper file with some
additional comments. In any case, I shall put a copy of this version in
p.b.s-f as soon as I have cleaned things a bit up.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
