 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Early Earth: The Late Heavy Bombardment [latest image]
Date: 6 Jul 2012 08:02:25
Message: <4ff6d3d1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Maybe physically not entirely correct, but visually certainly attractive :-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'earlyearth - lhb_04.png' (781 KB)
Preview of image 'earlyearth - lhb_04.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Paolo Gibellini
Subject: Re: Early Earth: The Late Heavy Bombardment [latest image]
Date: 6 Jul 2012 10:09:26
Message: <4ff6f196$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Thomas de Groot on date 06/07/2012 14.02 wrote:
> Maybe physically not entirely correct, but visually certainly attractive
> :-)
>
> Thomas
Wow, the explosion begins to become /great/!
;-)
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Early Earth: The Late Heavy Bombardment [latest image]
Date: 6 Jul 2012 10:31:47
Message: <4ff6f6d3$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 6-7-2012 16:10, Paolo Gibellini wrote:
> Wow, the explosion begins to become /great/!
> ;-)
Thanks Paolo! I am rather happy with this so far. Again, it does not
need to be scientifically correct all the way but to suggest the impact.
A few more things to do.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Jörg 'Yadgar' Bleimann
Subject: Re: Early Earth: The Late Heavy Bombardment [latest image]
Date: 6 Jul 2012 17:42:45
Message: <4ff75bd5$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi(gh)!
On 06.07.2012 14:02, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> Maybe physically not entirely correct, but visually certainly attractive
If the impact is several hundred kilometres afar, its blast should not
obscure the high wispy clouds...
See you in Khyberspace!
Yadgar
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Alain
Subject: Re: Early Earth: The Late Heavy Bombardment [latest image]
Date: 6 Jul 2012 21:55:23
Message: <4ff7970b$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Maybe physically not entirely correct, but visually certainly attractive
> :-)
>
> Thomas
Now you'r talking. Mostly incandecent ejectae. Not unrealistic if you
think a secong about just how much heat is released by that impact...
Then, there is all that heating from the huge supersonic shock wave.
Alain
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Alain
Subject: Re: Early Earth: The Late Heavy Bombardment [latest image]
Date: 6 Jul 2012 21:58:47
Message: <4ff797d7$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Hi(gh)!
>
> On 06.07.2012 14:02, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> Maybe physically not entirely correct, but visually certainly attractive
>
> If the impact is several hundred kilometres afar, its blast should not
> obscure the high wispy clouds...
>
> See you in Khyberspace!
>
> Yadgar
>
I agree. The top of the projection is probably climbing well abode those
clouds anyway, right up to the top of the statosphere, with some debrits
escaping back to outer space.
Alain
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
With the light output of those meteors, shouldn't they be creating diffraction
artifacts in your time machine's camera similar to those of the stars?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 7-7-2012 4:33, Cousin Ricky wrote:
> With the light output of those meteors, shouldn't they be creating diffraction
> artifacts in your time machine's camera similar to those of the stars?
>
I have been hesitating about that. The answer should be yes, shouldn't
it? I shall add small ones...
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Early Earth: The Late Heavy Bombardment [final image]
Date: 9 Jul 2012 08:03:53
Message: <4ffac8a9@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This should be the final development of the scene.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'earlyearth - lhb_05.png' (835 KB)
Preview of image 'earlyearth - lhb_05.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Paolo Gibellini
Subject: Re: Early Earth: The Late Heavy Bombardment [final image]
Date: 10 Jul 2012 04:06:08
Message: <4ffbe270$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Thomas de Groot on date 09/07/2012 14.03 wrote:
> This should be the final development of the scene.
>
> Thomas
Ooh.
The explosion is less terrifying (due to the daylight), but the sea and
the fog are very convincing.
;-)
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
