|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> On 12/04/2011 08:52 PM, clipka wrote:
>> Am 05.12.2011 02:44, schrieb clipka:
>>> .... Penrose "P1" tiled plane.
>>
>> ditto, but with just two colors.
>
> a touch of irid on this metal texture turned out cool ... had to dial
> down diffuse before it looked like I wanted
Nice one.
It looks like smoothly polished hematite.
Alain
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tenDOTlnDOTretniATtoorgedDOTt> wrote:
> On 5-12-2011 3:38, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> >
> > a touch of irid on this metal texture turned out cool ... had to dial
> > down diffuse before it looked like I wanted
>
> All Povers are equal, but some Povers are more equal than others.
>
> Hurray for RC4! :-)
>
> Thomas
very, very, funny guys (after suffering an attack of spasmodic anxiety due to
not finding rc4 news or Penrose tiling, etc.)
Expect news of my therapist.
B. Gimeno
pd. no, seriously, it was a joke, right? right? right?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 07/12/2011 8:30 PM, B. Gimeno wrote:
> Thomas de Groot<tenDOTlnDOTretniATtoorgedDOTt> wrote:
>> On 5-12-2011 3:38, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>>>
>>> a touch of irid on this metal texture turned out cool ... had to dial
>>> down diffuse before it looked like I wanted
>>
>> All Povers are equal, but some Povers are more equal than others.
>>
>> Hurray for RC4! :-)
>>
>> Thomas
>
> very, very, funny guys (after suffering an attack of spasmodic anxiety due to
> not finding rc4 news or Penrose tiling, etc.)
>
> Expect news of my therapist.
> B. Gimeno
>
> pd. no, seriously, it was a joke, right? right? right?
>
No, it was a touch of gentle pressure.
We want, what do we want?
;-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 7-12-2011 22:36, Stephen wrote:
>
> No, it was a touch of gentle pressure.
>
> We want, what do we want?
I suggest we go on strike. No more POV-Ray images here until we get RC4!
Hmmmm.... afraid that won't work.... ;-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 12/08/2011 02:52 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 7-12-2011 22:36, Stephen wrote:
>>
>> No, it was a touch of gentle pressure.
>>
>> We want, what do we want?
>
> I suggest we go on strike. No more POV-Ray images here until we get RC4!
>
> Hmmmm.... afraid that won't work.... ;-)
>
>
> Thomas
LOL ... The start of an Occupy POV-Ray movement?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 8-12-2011 15:16, Jim Holsenback wrote:
> On 12/08/2011 02:52 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> On 7-12-2011 22:36, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>> No, it was a touch of gentle pressure.
>>>
>>> We want, what do we want?
>>
>> I suggest we go on strike. No more POV-Ray images here until we get RC4!
>>
>> Hmmmm.... afraid that won't work.... ;-)
>>
>>
>> Thomas
>
> LOL ... The start of an Occupy POV-Ray movement?
Yeah! We are the 99%! ;-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot <tenDOTlnDOTretniATtoorgedDOTt> wrote:
> On 7-12-2011 22:36, Stephen wrote:
> >
> > No, it was a touch of gentle pressure.
> >
> > We want, what do we want?
>
> I suggest we go on strike. No more POV-Ray images here until we get RC4!
>
> Hmmmm.... afraid that won't work.... ;-)
>
>
> Thomas
Gentlemen: Times change. To attract the world's attention on this problem I
suggest the following hashtags in tweeter:
#Freedom2RC4
#JustinBieberNeedsRC4
#PenroseTiling4PoversNOW
B. Gimeno
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 08/12/2011 3:10 PM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 8-12-2011 15:16, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>> On 12/08/2011 02:52 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>> On 7-12-2011 22:36, Stephen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> No, it was a touch of gentle pressure.
>>>>
>>>> We want, what do we want?
>>>
>>> I suggest we go on strike. No more POV-Ray images here until we get RC4!
>>>
>>> Hmmmm.... afraid that won't work.... ;-)
>>>
>>>
>>> Thomas
>>
>> LOL ... The start of an Occupy POV-Ray movement?
>
> Yeah! We are the 99%! ;-)
>
> Thomas
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'occupy_pov01.jpg' (114 KB)
Preview of image 'occupy_pov01.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 8-12-2011 18:22, B. Gimeno wrote:
> Gentlemen: Times change. To attract the world's attention on this problem I
> suggest the following hashtags in tweeter:
>
> #Freedom2RC4
> #JustinBieberNeedsRC4
> #PenroseTiling4PoversNOW
>
We oldies have not yet discovered tweeter ;-)
Especially the Justin Bieber one is going to be effective I am sure :-)
Aahh... how time flies! In my days I would have said Paul & Ringo need
RC4... :-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 09.12.2011 00:09, schrieb Stephen:
> On 08/12/2011 3:10 PM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>> On 8-12-2011 15:16, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>>> On 12/08/2011 02:52 AM, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>>> On 7-12-2011 22:36, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> No, it was a touch of gentle pressure.
>>>>>
>>>>> We want, what do we want?
>>>>
>>>> I suggest we go on strike. No more POV-Ray images here until we get
>>>> RC4!
>>>>
>>>> Hmmmm.... afraid that won't work.... ;-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thomas
>>>
>>> LOL ... The start of an Occupy POV-Ray movement?
>>
>> Yeah! We are the 99%! ;-)
>>
>> Thomas
>
>[Occupy_POV01.jpg]
POV-Ray releases are like new computers: As soon as you got it, you wish
you'd have waited a week or two to get That One Even Better Offer.
For instance, I don't think this will make it into RC4 (guess what it is...)
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'subdivide.png' (276 KB)
Preview of image 'subdivide.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |