I just checked in a change to the area_illumination feature to properly 
respect distance-based light attenuation. See attached images for the 
difference.

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'test_rc3.png' (36 KB) Download 'test_new.png' (29 KB)

Preview of image 'test_rc3.png'

Preview of image 'test_new.png'

On 02/12/2011 5:49 PM, clipka wrote:
> I just checked in a change to the area_illumination feature to properly
> respect distance-based light attenuation. See attached images for the
> difference.
>

You're Brill!

When do we mere mortals get to play with RC4?

-- 
Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

Am 02.12.2011 19:02, schrieb Stephen:
> On 02/12/2011 5:49 PM, clipka wrote:
>> I just checked in a change to the area_illumination feature to properly
>> respect distance-based light attenuation. See attached images for the
>> difference.
>>
>
> You're Brill!

Thanks :-)

> When do we mere mortals get to play with RC4?

Difficult to tell ATM; as far as I can tell, Chris and Thorsten are 
currently busy fighting some problems with the Wiki. And Chris seems 
reulctant to issue a new RC because the installer still sucks.

Post a reply to this message

On 02/12/2011 6:23 PM, clipka wrote:

>>
>> You're Brill!
>
> Thanks :-)

No more than you deserve.

>
>> When do we mere mortals get to play with RC4?
>
> Difficult to tell ATM; as far as I can tell, Chris and Thorsten are
> currently busy fighting some problems with the Wiki. And Chris seems
> reulctant to issue a new RC because the installer still sucks.

Thanks for the info but tell Chris most of us (well me ;-) ) don't care 
too much about the installer sucking.

-- 
Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message

clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> I just checked in a change to the area_illumination feature to properly
> respect distance-based light attenuation. See attached images for the
> difference.

wonderful!

Post a reply to this message

> I just checked in a change to the area_illumination feature to properly
> respect distance-based light attenuation. See attached images for the
> difference.
>

It's a spectacular improvement.
Can we have at least a RC3.5, if we can't have the RC4 at the moment?


Alain

Post a reply to this message

Am 02.12.2011 23:09, schrieb Alain:

>> I just checked in a change to the area_illumination feature to properly
>> respect distance-based light attenuation. See attached images for the
>> difference.
>>
>
> It's a spectacular improvement.
> Can we have at least a RC3.5, if we can't have the RC4 at the moment?

If it was my call, you would already have an RC4 by now, and wouldn't 
have access to this updated feature either at the moment :-P

Post a reply to this message

On 2-12-2011 19:37, Stephen wrote:
> Thanks for the info but tell Chris most of us (well me ;-) ) don't care
> too much about the installer sucking.
>

Hear! Hear!

Supported! Supported!

[jumps up and down, waving arms]

Thomas

Post a reply to this message

clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> Am 02.12.2011 19:02, schrieb Stephen:
> > On 02/12/2011 5:49 PM, clipka wrote:
> >> I just checked in a change to the area_illumination feature to properly
> >> respect distance-based light attenuation. See attached images for the
> >> difference.
> >>
> >
> > You're Brill!
>
> Thanks :-)
>
> > When do we mere mortals get to play with RC4?
>
> Difficult to tell ATM; as far as I can tell, Chris and Thorsten are
> currently busy fighting some problems with the Wiki. And Chris seems
> reulctant to issue a new RC because the installer still sucks.

Or release to us unix-folk who don't care too much installers.

Post a reply to this message

clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> I just checked in a change to the area_illumination feature to properly
> respect distance-based light attenuation. See attached images for the
> difference.

Yes, it looks perfect! Indoor lighting just became a lot more feasible. Can't
wait to try it out :)

Post a reply to this message