POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Strangely low eval_pigment() values... Server Time
2 Nov 2024 16:09:59 EDT (-0400)
  Strangely low eval_pigment() values... (Message 1 to 5 of 5)  
From: Jörg 'Yadgar' Bleimann
Subject: Strangely low eval_pigment() values...
Date: 24 Oct 2010 17:54:40
Message: <4cc4ab20@news.povray.org>
High!

I recently started preparing for building Khyberspace (= POVghanistan) 
in earnest... I downloaded some SRTM Earth elevation data tiles of 
south-western Afghanistan, converted them to ASCII terrain matrices 
using 3DEM, and then (as 3DEM is not able to correct error pixels when 
they are adjacent to the tile's edges) convert them into 16-bit PNG 
heightfields using a self-programmed POV-Ray script.

Then I stitched together two of these heightfield tiles with error 
pixels (marked in blue by my POV-Ray script) and cut out a 1200 x 1200 
square tile from the mid-section of these combined tiles (attached 
below) which in turn I tried to re-convert into an ASCII matrix readable 
to 3DEM (to more conveniently clean up the remaining error pixels).

But my "png2ascii" script wrote strange values into that ASCII file - 
elevations are far too low, instead of some 350 metres below sea level, 
they should be around 500 metres above sea level! I checked the color 
vector output of eval_pigment(), and in fact the function returned red 
values between 0.01 and 0.05, where it should have been between 0.09 and 
0.16!

What went wrong with eval_pigment()?

Here is the code:

// Converting PNG 16-bit heightfields into SRTM ASCII terrain matrices

// Non-commercial use is free; any commercial usage needs written 
authorization by the copyright owner

#include "functions.inc"

#declare xdim=1200;
#declare ydim=1200;

#declare deadsea=422;
#declare everest=8848;
#declare rng=everest+deadsea;


#declare hf=
pigment
{
   image_map
   {
     png "../png_half_patched/n29e061-5.png"
   }
}

#fopen srtm "n29e061-5.txt" write
#declare b=0;
#while (b<ydim)
   #declare a=0;
   #while (a<xdim)
     #declare cv=eval_pigment(hf, <1/(xdim*2)+a*(1/xdim), 
1/(ydim*2)+b*(1/ydim), 0>);
     #warning vstr(3,cv,",",3,2)
     #declare h=rng*(cv.red+cv.green/256)-deadsea;
     #write (srtm, str(h, 1, 2), " ")
     #declare a=a+1;
   #end
   #declare b=b+1;
#end
#fclose srtm

camera
{
   orthographic
   up <0, ydim, 0>
   right <xdim, 0, 0>
   location <xdim/2, ydim/2, -10>
   look_at <xdim/2, ydim/2, 0>
}

// end of code

See you in Khyberspace!

Yadgar


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'n29e061-5.png' (1069 KB)

Preview of image 'n29e061-5.png'
n29e061-5.png


 

From: Jim Holsenback
Subject: Re: Strangely low eval_pigment() values...
Date: 24 Oct 2010 20:29:46
Message: <4cc4cf7a$1@news.povray.org>

> What went wrong with eval_pigment()?

http://wiki.povray.org/content/Documentation:Reference_Section_5#Specifying_an_Image_Map

in particular the file_gamma option:
http://wiki.povray.org/content/Documentation:Reference_Section_5#The_Gamma_Option


Post a reply to this message

From: Jörg 'Yadgar' Bleimann
Subject: Re: Strangely low eval_pigment() values...
Date: 26 Oct 2010 20:39:00
Message: <4cc774a4$1@news.povray.org>
High!

On 10/25/2010 02:29 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:

>
http://wiki.povray.org/content/Documentation:Reference_Section_5#Specifying_an_Image_Map
>
> in particular the file_gamma option:
> http://wiki.povray.org/content/Documentation:Reference_Section_5#The_Gamma_Option

Yes, I looked that up, but in refers to PoV-Ray 3.7, while I still use 
3.6 (and will continue so as long as it is still beta, as a friend of 
mine who is also an avid PoVer frequently experiences crashes when 
running 3.7)... but then I just adjusted assumed gamma to 2.2 and now 
color values are perfect!

Nevertheless, thank you for the hint!

See you in Khyberspace!

Yadgar


Post a reply to this message

From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Strangely low eval_pigment() values...
Date: 27 Oct 2010 03:27:30
Message: <4cc7d462$1@news.povray.org>

news:4cc774a4$1@news.povray.org...
> Yes, I looked that up, but in refers to PoV-Ray 3.7, while I still use 3.6 
> (and will continue so as long as it is still beta, as a friend of mine who 
> is also an avid PoVer frequently experiences crashes when running 3.7)... 
> but then I just adjusted assumed gamma to 2.2 and now color values are 
> perfect!
>

I am not an expert ;-)  but I don't think those crashes are due to POV-Ray 
3.7.... You can use the beta safely. It never crashed on me at least (using 
the Windows version).

Thomas


Post a reply to this message

From: Alain
Subject: Re: Strangely low eval_pigment() values...
Date: 27 Oct 2010 21:39:39
Message: <4cc8d45b@news.povray.org>

> High!
>
> On 10/25/2010 02:29 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>
>>
http://wiki.povray.org/content/Documentation:Reference_Section_5#Specifying_an_Image_Map
>>
>>
>> in particular the file_gamma option:
>> http://wiki.povray.org/content/Documentation:Reference_Section_5#The_Gamma_Option
>>
>
> Yes, I looked that up, but in refers to PoV-Ray 3.7, while I still use
> 3.6 (and will continue so as long as it is still beta, as a friend of
> mine who is also an avid PoVer frequently experiences crashes when
> running 3.7)... but then I just adjusted assumed gamma to 2.2 and now
> color values are perfect!
>
> Nevertheless, thank you for the hint!
>
> See you in Khyberspace!
>
> Yadgar
>

Version 3.7 is prety stable and not prone to crash.
Maybe the crashes of your friend are due to something else on his computer.


Alain


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.