|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Too bad that there are no enough words in any language to describe the solution
to the Rubik's trifoil in three dimensions. Thanks for the inspiration Bill.
B. Gimeno
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'torusknot.jpg' (101 KB)
Preview of image 'torusknot.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Resolved!
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'torusknot2.jpg' (93 KB)
Preview of image 'torusknot2.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"B. Gimeno" <bgi### [at] lycoses> schreef in bericht
news:web.4cbe0c5d53d02d38a1d816f50@news.povray.org...
> Resolved!
>
>
>
WOW! You did it! :-)
Nice construction btw!
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"B. Gimeno" <bgi### [at] lycoses> wrote:
> Too bad that there are no enough words in any language to describe the solution
> to the Rubik's trifoil in three dimensions. Thanks for the inspiration Bill.
I like it! It's always a fun shape to play with :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>B. Gimeno on date 19/10/2010 23:16 wrote:
> Too bad that there are no enough words in any language to describe the solution
> to the Rubik's trifoil in three dimensions. Thanks for the inspiration Bill.
>
> B. Gimeno
Lol!
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10/20/2010 1:26 AM, Bill Pragnell wrote:
> "B. Gimeno"<bgi### [at] lycoses> wrote:
>> Too bad that there are no enough words in any language to describe the solution
>> to the Rubik's trifoil in three dimensions. Thanks for the inspiration Bill.
>
> I like it! It's always a fun shape to play with :)
>
perhaps it would be quicker to list the words that do not describe it.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
some_yahoo <no### [at] waycom> wrote:
> On 10/20/2010 1:26 AM, Bill Pragnell wrote:
> > "B. Gimeno"<bgi### [at] lycoses> wrote:
> >> Too bad that there are no enough words in any language to describe the solution
> >> to the Rubik's trifoil in three dimensions. Thanks for the inspiration Bill.
> >
> > I like it! It's always a fun shape to play with :)
> >
> perhaps it would be quicker to list the words that do not describe it.
Ook, ook!
Ook?
Ook Gimeno
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 21/10/2010 9:20 PM, B. Gimeno wrote:
> some_yahoo<no### [at] waycom> wrote:
>> On 10/20/2010 1:26 AM, Bill Pragnell wrote:
>>> "B. Gimeno"<bgi### [at] lycoses> wrote:
>>>> Too bad that there are no enough words in any language to describe the solution
>>>> to the Rubik's trifoil in three dimensions. Thanks for the inspiration Bill.
>>>
>>> I like it! It's always a fun shape to play with :)
>>>
>> perhaps it would be quicker to list the words that do not describe it.
>
> Ook, ook!
> Ook?
>
> Ook Gimeno
>
Keep taking the dried frog pills ;-)
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 10/20/2010 12:16 AM, B. Gimeno wrote:
> Too bad that there are no enough words in any language to describe the solution
> to the Rubik's trifoil in three dimensions. Thanks for the inspiration Bill.
I don't think it could be solved because it's not possible to perform
the necessary rotations.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> On 10/20/2010 12:16 AM, B. Gimeno wrote:
> > Too bad that there are no enough words in any language to describe the solution
> > to the Rubik's trifoil in three dimensions. Thanks for the inspiration Bill.
>
> I don't think it could be solved because it's not possible to perform
> the necessary rotations.
Ironically, your post was answered even before it is released. (Ook!)
On the other hand, it is questionable if you use sarcasm as a weapon, which I
prefer to believe rather than think a guy as smart as you lack the sensitivity
needed to see art in front of his nose.
No response is required. Thanks.
B. Gimeno
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |