Revisited an old IRTC scene. At the time I couldn't get the scene to render 
because the program kept crashing. Seems to work fine now.

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'waterlilies.jpg' (305 KB)

Preview of image 'waterlilies.jpg'

"Mike Hough" <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> Revisited an old IRTC scene. At the time I couldn't get the scene to render
> because the program kept crashing. Seems to work fine now.

I like the goldfish. The lilies and the flowers could use some more texturing.
Maybe put a frog in there. And perhaps a shark with lasers...

Post a reply to this message

"Mike Hough" <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> Revisited an old IRTC scene. At the time I couldn't get the scene to render
> because the program kept crashing. Seems to work fine now.

Synchronicity in action I guess - I haven't seen any water lilies in quite a
while but I just saw Gilles' new postings on Oyonale yesterday, including these
AMAZING water lilies (but would we expect anything less from him?)

http://www.oyonale.com/image.php?code=916&mode=info&section=2008&lang=en

Cheers,
Rob

Post a reply to this message

Yes, they must have "lasers", it would definately be "evil".

:-D

ian

"jhu" <nomail@nomail> wrote in message 
news:web.4995823828be4b88b562d820@news.povray.org...
> "Mike Hough" <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> Revisited an old IRTC scene. At the time I couldn't get the scene to 
>> render
>> because the program kept crashing. Seems to work fine now.
>
> I like the goldfish. The lilies and the flowers could use some more 
> texturing.
> Maybe put a frog in there. And perhaps a shark with lasers...
>
>

Post a reply to this message

I never see water that clean/clear around here, even at a pond fed by a 
spring. Reminds of some Florida springs I've seen before. Must be happy 
fish, unless that also means less food. ha ha
: )
Wavy grid-like appearance at upper right is curious, thought it was 
reflection but must be the light-play from photons used and water surface 
shape(?).

Bob

Post a reply to this message

Yes, even though lily pads are flat mine are especially flat.

Hmm, laser sharks...

"jhu" <nomail@nomail> wrote in message 
news:web.4995823828be4b88b562d820@news.povray.org...
> "Mike Hough" <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> Revisited an old IRTC scene. At the time I couldn't get the scene to 
>> render
>> because the program kept crashing. Seems to work fine now.
>
> I like the goldfish. The lilies and the flowers could use some more 
> texturing.
> Maybe put a frog in there. And perhaps a shark with lasers...
>

Post a reply to this message

Same color even. Am working on another version, different cultivar :)


"Robert McGregor" <rob### [at] mcgregorfineartcom> wrote in message 
news:web.4995a0cc28be4b886ff1d480@news.povray.org...
> "Mike Hough" <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> Revisited an old IRTC scene. At the time I couldn't get the scene to 
>> render
>> because the program kept crashing. Seems to work fine now.
>
> Synchronicity in action I guess - I haven't seen any water lilies in quite 
> a
> while but I just saw Gilles' new postings on Oyonale yesterday, including 
> these
> AMAZING water lilies (but would we expect anything less from him?)
>
> http://www.oyonale.com/image.php?code=916&mode=info&section=2008&lang=en
>
> Cheers,
> Rob
>

Post a reply to this message

Yes, I used photons and they are brighter in the deeper water. Probably 
because that is the area where the focus is the sharpest.

Speaking of clean water, I had a version with scattering media that looked 
very murky. Might try that again, although it didn't look like a good place 
for the fish to live

"Bob" <omniverse*charter!net> wrote in message 
news:499606a8$1@news.povray.org...
>I never see water that clean/clear around here, even at a pond fed by a 
>spring. Reminds of some Florida springs I've seen before. Must be happy 
>fish, unless that also means less food. ha ha
> : )
> Wavy grid-like appearance at upper right is curious, thought it was 
> reflection but must be the light-play from photons used and water surface 
> shape(?).
>
> Bob
>
>

Post a reply to this message