 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Eh, could be better, though these wings are really nice for posing (albeit
not ideal...far too few feathers so they look not so good). Can only stand
so much fiddling around with trying to get a nice light setup when it takes
15 mins to get a decently detailed preview.
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.freesitespace.net
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download '2008-12-03.jpg' (85 KB)
Preview of image '2008-12-03.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tim Cook wrote:
> Eh, could be better, though these wings are really nice for posing
> (albeit not ideal...far too few feathers so they look not so good). Can
> only stand so much fiddling around with trying to get a nice light setup
> when it takes 15 mins to get a decently detailed preview.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Looks like it could be a CD-cover. Perhaps Within Temptation oslt.
-Aero
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tim Cook" <z99### [at] gmail com> schreef in bericht
news:4936c84c@news.povray.org...
> Eh, could be better, though these wings are really nice for posing (albeit
> not ideal...far too few feathers so they look not so good). Can only
> stand
> so much fiddling around with trying to get a nice light setup when it
> takes
> 15 mins to get a decently detailed preview.
>
Well, they look credible, and that is what is intended. The old masters
painting angels did not count the feathers either :-) The important thing
is to create the illusion of real wings and you succeeded well here.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tim Cook" <z99### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> Eh, could be better, though these wings are really nice for posing (albeit
> not ideal...far too few feathers so they look not so good). Can only stand
> so much fiddling around with trying to get a nice light setup when it takes
> 15 mins to get a decently detailed preview.
>
> --
> Tim Cook
> http://empyrean.freesitespace.net
Looks good.
I've been looking for wings for a long time. Where did you get them? or did you
maybe code them? If so, are you willing to share the code?
-Nekar
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Nekar Xenos" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
> I've been looking for wings for a long time. Where did you get them? or
> did you
> maybe code them? If so, are you willing to share the code?
Um, er, daz.com...*whistles innocently*
ps_ac2594 - Feathered wings
*cough*demonoid.com*cough*
I had Sharkey's Ultimate Wings on my old computer and they have more
feathers but don't pose well. The Feathered Wings pose as realistically as
can be expected but the complete lack of covert and alula feathers maked it
look a bit naked, and the quills stand out too much.
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.freesitespace.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nice pose, and lighting too.
That media-filled(?) light shaft is gorgeous.
KW
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Kenneth" <kdw### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:
> Nice pose, and lighting too.
> That media-filled(?) light shaft is gorgeous.
interior{media{
method 3
intervals 10
ratio 0.8
samples 3
aa_level 6
aa_threshold 0.03
jitter 0.5
confidence 0.9
variance 0.1
absorption -0.1
scattering{3, rgb 0.1}
density{
agate
agate_turb 2.0
color_map{
[0.00 rgb 0]
[0.01 rgb <2,0,0>]
[0.02 rgb 0]
[0.20 rgb 0]
[0.25 rgb 0.5]
[0.45 rgb 0]
[0.98 rgb <0.25,0.25,0>]
[1.00 rgb <4,4,5>]
}
scale 0.01
}
}}
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.freesitespace.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tim Cook" <z99### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> "Kenneth" <kdw### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:
> > Nice pose, and lighting too.
> > That media-filled(?) light shaft is gorgeous.
>
> interior{media{....
Thanks! Looking forward to playing around with it.
KW
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
