Render time 11 hours, 50 minutes, 25 seconds.

-- 
William Tracy
afi### [at] gmailcom -- wtr### [at] calpolyedu

#undef FLOAT /* This is for hpux. They should change hpux.  */
     -- from the GCC source code

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'systematest.jpg' (40 KB)

Preview of image 'systematest.jpg'

William Tracy <wtr### [at] calpolyedu> wrote:
> Render time 11 hours, 50 minutes, 25 seconds.
>
> --
> William Tracy
> afi### [at] gmailcom -- wtr### [at] calpolyedu
>
> #undef FLOAT /* This is for hpux. They should change hpux.  */
>      -- from the GCC source code

The flare looks nice, but I have no idea what I'm looking at.  Maybe I should
have taken Latin after all.

Post a reply to this message

Kirk Andrews napsal(a):
> William Tracy <wtr### [at] calpolyedu> wrote:
>> Render time 11 hours, 50 minutes, 25 seconds.
>>
>> --
>> William Tracy
>> afi### [at] gmailcom -- wtr### [at] calpolyedu
>>
>> #undef FLOAT /* This is for hpux. They should change hpux.  */
>>      -- from the GCC source code
> 
> The flare looks nice, but I have no idea what I'm looking at.  Maybe I should
> have taken Latin after all.
> 
look at the TC-RTC picture "systema metropolis"
http://tc-rtc.co.uk/imagenewdisplay/stills/98/Systema_Metropolis_In_the_Wild.html

-- 
You know you've been raytracing too long when...
you start thinking up your own "You know you've been raytracing too long 
when..." sigs (I did).
-Johnny D

Post a reply to this message

Jan Dvorak <jan### [at] centrumcz> wrote:
> Kirk Andrews napsal(a):
> > William Tracy <wtr### [at] calpolyedu> wrote:
> >> Render time 11 hours, 50 minutes, 25 seconds.
> >>
> >> --
> >> William Tracy
> >> afi### [at] gmailcom -- wtr### [at] calpolyedu
> >>
> >> #undef FLOAT /* This is for hpux. They should change hpux.  */
> >>      -- from the GCC source code
> >
> > The flare looks nice, but I have no idea what I'm looking at.  Maybe I should
> > have taken Latin after all.
> >
> look at the TC-RTC picture "systema metropolis"
> http://tc-rtc.co.uk/imagenewdisplay/stills/98/Systema_Metropolis_In_the_Wild.html
>
> --
> You know you've been raytracing too long when...
> you start thinking up your own "You know you've been raytracing too long
> when..." sigs (I did).
> -Johnny D

Ok, but I'm still lost--Am I looking up at it from below?

Post a reply to this message

Kirk Andrews wrote:
> Ok, but I'm still lost--Am I looking up at it from below?

Yes--the machines are supposed to be ~40 feet tall.

I didn't realize that the image was so unclear--I may have to rethink 
this. Thanks for letting me know.

-- 
William Tracy
afi### [at] gmailcom -- wtr### [at] calpolyedu

One major known problem with supporting V-class is the complexity of its 
PCI bus adapter (EPIC and SAGA). Support for the V-class isn't going to 
happen until some really masochistic person who has access to a V-class 
is, uh, challenged by this.
     -- from the Linux-on-HPPA FAQ

Post a reply to this message

"William Tracy" <wtr### [at] calpolyedu> schreef in bericht 
news:480949c4$1@news.povray.org...
> Kirk Andrews wrote:
>> Ok, but I'm still lost--Am I looking up at it from below?
>
> Yes--the machines are supposed to be ~40 feet tall.
>
> I didn't realize that the image was so unclear--I may have to rethink 
> this. Thanks for letting me know.
>

It is mainly because the machine appears out of context, as it were. There 
is no reference point to compare it with and the flare doesn't help either 
:-)
That said, I think that a few tree tops, a bit of sky, and a less pronounced 
flare would do the trick. I am intrigued by this machine and would like to 
see more of it. Wandering mushrooms indeed!

Thomas

Post a reply to this message

Thomas de Groot napsal(a):
> "William Tracy" <wtr### [at] calpolyedu> schreef in bericht 
> news:480949c4$1@news.povray.org...
>> Kirk Andrews wrote:
>>> Ok, but I'm still lost--Am I looking up at it from below?
>> Yes--the machines are supposed to be ~40 feet tall.
>>
>> I didn't realize that the image was so unclear--I may have to rethink 
>> this. Thanks for letting me know.
>>
> 
> It is mainly because the machine appears out of context, as it were. There 
> is no reference point to compare it with and the flare doesn't help either 
> :-)
> That said, I think that a few tree tops, a bit of sky, and a less pronounced 
> flare would do the trick. I am intrigued by this machine and would like to 
> see more of it. Wandering mushrooms indeed!
> 
> Thomas
> 
> 
a few persons leaning on one of the legs?

-- 
You know you've been raytracing too long when...
you ever saw a beautiful scenery and regretted not to take your 6" 
reflective ball and a digital camera, thinking "this would have been a 
perfect light probe"
-Johnny D

Post a reply to this message