 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Trying to make this work. I want to achieve the feeling of loneliness, but
the minimalist approach here doesn't work. I think I have to dirty it up a
bit more.
Comments and help will be much appreciated.
--
-Nekar Xenos-
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Sunflower alley.png' (420 KB)
Preview of image 'Sunflower alley.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nekar Xenos wrote:
> Comments and help will be much appreciated.
Try with a much stronger contrast to see if it helps.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The first one was rendered in 3.7 Beta with media and radiosity. here's the
same file with 3.6
--
-Nekar Xenos-
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Sunflower alley.png' (409 KB)
Preview of image 'Sunflower alley.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Nekar Xenos" <nek### [at] gmail com> wrote:
> The first one was rendered in 3.7 Beta with media and radiosity. here's the
> same file with 3.6
>
>
> --
> -Nekar Xenos-
I like the idea, and good job on the flower and the texture on the wall. If you
want to get the idea of loneliness, I think the environment might need to
change. I'm not sure why, but the picture does not make me feel lonely. I
think if you had buildings further in the background and added a focal blur,
such that only the flower were in focus, it would communicate loneliness
better.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nekar Xenos wrote:
> The first one was rendered in 3.7 Beta with media and radiosity. here's the
> same file with 3.6
I think you had different gamma settings. (3.7 uses different default
gamma for some reason.)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> Nekar Xenos wrote:
>
>>The first one was rendered in 3.7 Beta with media and radiosity. here's the
>>same file with 3.6
>
>
> I think you had different gamma settings. (3.7 uses different default
> gamma for some reason.)
I'm getting a strange effect with these images apparently due to the
gamma settings. In Thunderbird the first image looks very pale and
washed out and the second one is much darker -- contrast is still rather
low, but definitely _much_ darker. However, when I save them and look
at them with a separate graphics viewer (GQview or the GIMP in Linux)
they both look the same.
Very puzzling... :-/
-=- Larry -=-
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Larry Hudson nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2008/03/26 21:22:
> Warp wrote:
>> Nekar Xenos wrote:
>>
>>> The first one was rendered in 3.7 Beta with media and radiosity.
>>> here's the same file with 3.6
>>
>>
>> I think you had different gamma settings. (3.7 uses different default
>> gamma for some reason.)
>
> I'm getting a strange effect with these images apparently due to the
> gamma settings. In Thunderbird the first image looks very pale and
> washed out and the second one is much darker -- contrast is still rather
> low, but definitely _much_ darker. However, when I save them and look
> at them with a separate graphics viewer (GQview or the GIMP in Linux)
> they both look the same.
>
> Very puzzling... :-/
>
> -=- Larry -=-
Switching between the two versions, I can see:
The noise generatior is different. The brick wall is more interesting in yhe 3.7
version.
The lighting under the overhanging parts is different.
--
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
You know you've been raytracing too long when you look at real clouds and
criticise their media and radiosity settings.
Tom Melly
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Alain wrote:
> Larry Hudson nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2008/03/26 21:22:
>
>> Warp wrote:
>>
>>> Nekar Xenos wrote:
>>>
>>>> The first one was rendered in 3.7 Beta with media and radiosity.
>>>> here's the same file with 3.6
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I think you had different gamma settings. (3.7 uses different default
>>> gamma for some reason.)
>>
>>
>> I'm getting a strange effect with these images apparently due to the
>> gamma settings. In Thunderbird the first image looks very pale and
>> washed out and the second one is much darker -- contrast is still
>> rather low, but definitely _much_ darker. However, when I save them
>> and look at them with a separate graphics viewer (GQview or the GIMP
>> in Linux) they both look the same.
>>
>> Very puzzling... :-/
>>
>> -=- Larry -=-
>
> Switching between the two versions, I can see:
> The noise generatior is different. The brick wall is more interesting in
> yhe 3.7 version.
> The lighting under the overhanging parts is different.
>
Yes, I see those differences too, but I was just commenting on the
difference in the brightness/contrast that I was seeing in Thunderbird
vs separate graphics viewers. But you're right, I should have been more
specific.
-=- Larry -=-
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
