 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I'm in the process of doing a macro for the object collection to add labels
to objects. Here's a demo scene to show where I've got to so far with it.
Any feedback on this scene, questions about the macro or ideas for
additional features welcome.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'labeller.jpg' (88 KB)
Preview of image 'labeller.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chris B escribió:
> I'm in the process of doing a macro for the object collection to add labels
> to objects. Here's a demo scene to show where I've got to so far with it.
> Any feedback on this scene, questions about the macro or ideas for
> additional features welcome.
>
Is that blurred reflection with micronormals? Needs more AA!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Useful idea.
Additional feature: Hmm... Maybe a partial peel-off, like old labels?
Otherwise it could remain the way it is, I wouldn't have any other ideas.
Sven
"Chris B" <nom### [at] nomail com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:47b89c4a@news.povray.org...
> I'm in the process of doing a macro for the object collection to add
> labels to objects. Here's a demo scene to show where I've got to so far
> with it. Any feedback on this scene, questions about the macro or ideas
> for additional features welcome.
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The blurred reflection would work better using
http://tag.povray.org/povQandT/languageQandT.html#blurredreflection
(See eg. http://warp.povusers.org/pics/RubiksRevenge2.jpg )
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chris B wrote:
> I'm in the process of doing a macro for the object collection to add labels
> to objects. Here's a demo scene to show where I've got to so far with it.
> Any feedback on this scene, questions about the macro or ideas for
> additional features welcome.
>
>
>
Hi Chris, these produce some nice effects, such as the rounded corners.
Can you send to me or put the code out here?
Meanwhile I have been trying to refine the 'ink bottle' macros
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jim Charter" <jrc### [at] msncom> wrote in message
news:47c069cd@news.povray.org...
> Chris B wrote:
>> I'm in the process of doing a macro for the object collection to add
>> labels to objects.
> Hi Chris, these produce some nice effects, such as the rounded corners.
> Can you send to me or put the code out here?
>
> Meanwhile I have been trying to refine the 'ink bottle' macros
I've emailed you a copy as is. It's about 800KB, so I'm hoping there aren't
email limits that block it. If you don't receive it, let me know.
Regards,
Chris B.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:47b991a7@news.povray.org...
> The blurred reflection would work better using
>
> http://tag.povray.org/povQandT/languageQandT.html#blurredreflection
>
> (See eg. http://warp.povusers.org/pics/RubiksRevenge2.jpg )
Hi, Yes I think that looks better. Renders about 6 times slower though.
Regards,
Chris B.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'labeller.jpg' (112 KB)
Preview of image 'labeller.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Chris B wrote:
> Hi, Yes I think that looks better. Renders about 6 times slower though.
Still looks grainy.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:47c1525e$1@news.povray.org...
> Chris B wrote:
>> Hi, Yes I think that looks better. Renders about 6 times slower though.
>
> Still looks grainy.
Yes. Do you know what settings were used for the surface in the Rubik's
Revenge scene?
The last image I posted used 8 BlurSamples. This one uses 40 and still looks
a little grainy, as well as increasing the render time from 3 minutes with
the original surface to 2hours 23 minutes.
Regards,
Chris B.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'labeller.jpg' (100 KB)
Preview of image 'labeller.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Chris B" <nom### [at] nomailcom> wrote in message
news:47c18eb9@news.povray.org...
>
> "Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
> news:47c1525e$1@news.povray.org...
>> Chris B wrote:
>>> Hi, Yes I think that looks better. Renders about 6 times slower though.
>>
>> Still looks grainy.
>
> The last image I posted used 8 BlurSamples. This one uses 40 and still
> looks a little grainy, as well as increasing the render time from 3
> minutes with the original surface to 2hours 23 minutes.
>
I've uploaded the Labeller macros onto the POV-Ray object collection. I used
an image generated with 50 BlurSamples for the main image in the end which
took a lot longer to render and still looks grainier than the Rubiks Revenge
image.
See: http://lib.povray.org/collection/labeller/chrisb%201.0/labeller.html
Regards,
Chris B.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
