 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
> it reminds me of one of your early scenes: bodega... :)
Could be because both use only one golden light? ;)
BTW, next on my "remake" list is a "wine cellar" scene with these barrels
and a wider view of the cellar, similar as how Jhu did recently.
--
Jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
> I like the textures and the lighting, but I'm not sure about the
> composition. Imho there are to many vertically aligned objects: the candle,
> the bottle and the vase.
Yes, there is something disturbing about it... but I'm not at all a
conscious composer: I usually do trial&error for the composition. In this
case I didn't finish yet this part... and here you suggestions can be of
great help, thanks.
> I'm no expert in composition, but this is how I would do it: I would use the
> bottle as a candle-holder (with some dripped wax along the sides,
Yes, I was already thinking on something like this... but on the other
hand I liked the idea of having a bottle with wine still in it. Perhaps I
can have two bottles, one as candle-holder and other with wine to drink.
Indeed, I also toyed the idea of making a more general candle macro which
accepts an object as parameter, to make the dripping fall over it... but in
my head it seemed a too complex use of trace(), and I wanted to just make a
quick scene to get ride of that lack of inspiration.
> keep the glass, the vase and the peaches (they are peaches, right? well,
> they look like peaches :)) where they're now,
I'm glad it was clear they were peaches... I didn't mention it on
purpose, to see if someone asked "what the hell is that fruit?". But seems
it is at least recognizable as a peach thanks to the aoi pattern.
> and add something metal lying on the
> table in between the bottle and the vase, not sure what though (maybe the
> current candle-holder (what's the name anyway? :)), but lying down?)
This is indeed a great idea... as if the beautiful candle holder was
discarded for being too nice, and replaced for a more rustic holder instead.
It is worth a try... ;)
> of course you'd lose the interesting caustics :(
Not necessarily... I can have two bottles! :)
--
Jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
From: Jaime Vives Piqueres
Subject: Re: Bodegon (Still life) [42Kb]
Date: 21 Feb 2008 05:07:44
Message: <47bd4d70@news.povray.org>
|
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
> Nice! The peach fuzz is perfect, and the lighting has just the right amount of
> dim and mysterious!
Thanks! The fuzz is a simple aoi texture from withe to orange, with a bit
of ambient (0.1) and a granite micro-normal. For the lighting I had to use
two white boxes at the sides, out of the camera view, to reflect some of the
radiosity back... otherwise the scene was too dark.
--
Jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
> Hmmm... Love those textures!
Thanks!
> I partly agree with Zeger's comment on the composition. I think candle and
> bottle are too close together somehow, and maybe you could use a portrait
> format for this image.
Yes, I must try the portrait format... seems like it's crying for it, now
that you mention it. Thanks!
--
Jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"Jaime Vives Piqueres" <jai### [at] ignorancia org> schreef in bericht
news:47bd49ca$1@news.povray.org...
>
> Indeed, I also toyed the idea of making a more general candle macro
> which accepts an object as parameter, to make the dripping fall over it...
> but in my head it seemed a too complex use of trace(), and I wanted to
> just make a quick scene to get ride of that lack of inspiration.
>
Jim Charter did something very convincing in this direction in one of his
African ritualistic objects.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Jaime Vives Piqueres napsal(a):
>> Nice! The peach fuzz is perfect, and the lighting has just the right
>> amount of
>> dim and mysterious!
>
> Thanks! The fuzz is a simple aoi texture from withe to orange, with a
> bit of ambient (0.1) and a granite micro-normal. For the lighting I had
> to use two white boxes at the sides, out of the camera view, to reflect
> some of the radiosity back... otherwise the scene was too dark.
>
> --
> Jaime
maybe you could try to use a tone mapping feature in megapov.
--
the ultimate time-killer:
+a0.0 +am2 +r9
Johnny D
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Jaime Vives Piqueres wrote:
>> it reminds me of one of your early scenes: bodega... :)
>
> Could be because both use only one golden light? ;)
well, actually since you posted the image here, I didn't even go to your
site to check it out. :)
But I was sure I've seen that botijo before. So, that's it: this is a
blend of your old botijo SUMMER entry in the IRTC and bodegon.
BTW, perhaps that weird caustic is caused by photons going through the
candle's wax?
> BTW, next on my "remake" list is a "wine cellar" scene with these
> barrels and a wider view of the cellar, similar as how Jhu did recently.
good! POV-Ray and still life seem to get pretty nicely along.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"Jaime Vives Piqueres" <jai### [at] ignorancia org> wrote in message
news:47bc7d3e@news.povray.org...
> I'm back at regular poving... not because the inspiration suddenly
> returned,
> but because I'm more determined to get back anyhow. As someone said, the
> inspiration needs to find you working when it returns...
>
Very nice! Keep in mind that you inspire a lot of us, too. I'm glad to see
you're poving again. :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Among other things, Jaime Vives Piqueres saw fit to write:
> As someone
> said, the inspiration needs to find you working when it returns...
I heard that on the radio just yesterday, they said it was Picasso who said
that ;)
--
light_source{9+9*x,1}camera{orthographic look_at(1-y)/4angle 30location
9/4-z*4}light_source{-9*z,1}union{box{.9-z.1+x clipped_by{plane{2+y-4*x
0}}}box{z-y-.1.1+z}box{-.1.1+x}box{.1z-.1}pigment{rgb<.8.2,1>}}//Jellby
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Zeger Knaepen wrote:
> I like the textures and the lighting, but I'm not sure about the
> composition. Imho there are to many vertically aligned objects: the candle,
> the bottle and the vase.
What strikes me as more of a problems is a combination of the following:
1. We have three tall objects that are almost exactly the same height.
2. The tall objects are lined up in a perfect row.
3. We have three short objects almost the same size.
4. The short objects are lined up in a perfect row.
We need more variety, actually. Move a few objects forward or backward
to break up the lines, and give the scene more depth.
I take that back--the urn is farther back than the bottle and candle.
However, it doesn't *feel* like it is--the top is lined up with the top
of the bottle too well.
--
William Tracy
afi### [at] gmail com -- wtr### [at] calpoly edu
And the Format source code tells me that *really* the indicator of an
error is whether the index has changed value or not. If it has *not*
changed value, then some of the Format class' innards assume that since
parsing didn't happen, an error must have occurred. (Pause for
Buddhist-like contemplation of this leap of logic and faith.)
-- Laird Nelson, blogging on the "dank recesses" of java.text
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |