 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Mike the Elder" <zer### [at] wyan org> wrote in message
news:web.47964c3185408aa9e2b2e7080@news.povray.org...
> "Jeremy M. Praay" <jer### [at] questsoftwarecmo> wrote:
>> I've finally updated my scene from... uhh... Well, a long time ago,
>> anyway.
> .....It's something that appeals to me quite a bit, so I
>> hope to make a few more. :-)
>
> Splendid! I'm looking forward to what comes next.
>
Me too. I hope I can finish creating the "next".
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:37:40 -0500, Jim Charter wrote:
> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:12:44 -0500, Jeremy M. Praay wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Rego"? Is that a word?
>>
>>
>> Sure is - though usually hyphenated (ie, "Re-go").
>>
>> It means "To return, go back."
>>
>> :-)
>>
>> Jim
> Jeez, hope I didn't insult my surgeon friend.
LOL!
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:00:38 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 22 Jan 2008 15:43:38 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:12:44 -0500, Jeremy M. Praay wrote:
>>
>>> "Rego"? Is that a word?
>>
>>Sure is - though usually hyphenated (ie, "Re-go").
>>
>>It means "To return, go back."
>>
>>:-)
>>
>>Jim
>
> Groan!
Gotta love us language pedants. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 22 Jan 2008 18:09:10 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>Gotta love us language pedants. ;-)
>
>Jim
I do!
Readers I married her :)
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:14:09 -0500, "Jeremy M. Praay"
<jer### [at] questsoftwarecmo> wrote:
>I've finally updated my scene from... uhh... Well, a long time ago,
>anyway.
I remember the original. (Do you have a link?)
This is a very nice image and I can't think of any improvements that you could
make.
Unless it was to make the figures more chintzy :)
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The first version was beautiful, and so is this one. :-)
--
William Tracy
afi### [at] gmailcom -- wtr### [at] calpolyedu
You know you've been raytracing too long when you hire 4 guys named
Vince to help you "borrow" a Cray Supercomputer.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:14:02 +0000, Stephen wrote:
> On 22 Jan 2008 18:09:10 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>
>>Gotta love us language pedants. ;-)
>>
>>Jim
>
> I do!
> Readers I married her :)
>
> Regards
> Stephen
Just to be clear, it's not *me* you married. ;-)
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 22 Jan 2008 20:10:01 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:14:02 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 22 Jan 2008 18:09:10 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Gotta love us language pedants. ;-)
>>>
>>>Jim
>>
>> I do!
>> Readers I married her :)
>>
>> Regards
>> Stephen
>
>Just to be clear, it's not *me* you married. ;-)
>
LOL
Unless your name is Regan ;)
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Excellent work! I love your dualistic concept. It much appeals to my own
perceptions. Your care for even the least detail is really amazing. This is
going to be a very interesting and beautiful series.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jeremy M. Praay" <jer### [at] questsoftwarecmo> schreef in bericht
news:47963657$1@news.povray.org...
>>
>> o Girl on a swing with the lad pushing her.
>
> I had already started on that concept, but had trouble getting the "on the
> swing" pose to work with the clothes in Poser. Nevertheless, that's one
> idea that I really like, and will hopefully figure out a way to do it.
Maybe PoserPhysics may help here? I have not yet experimented enough with it
to know for sure, but it seems to have possibilities in that direction...
>
> Actually, the child behind the tree is her little sister, but it's kind of
> hard to tell here. I just realized that I forgot to put the ribbon in the
> hat, which should have made it a bit less ambiguous. She looks something
> like this: http://www.stomptokyo.com/img-m2/totoro-1.jpg Initially, there
> was no little sister, but after watching "My Neighbor Totoro" again (a
> couple months ago), that type of character seemed to fit, and she adds a
> bit more to the story.
>
That reminds me of my Cathy series, where I introduced her little brother...
:-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
