 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
At first I liked this, but now I don't.
I'm not sure why, maybe it's too red,
or too simple to code, or just too much
like other "modern" paintings.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'swirl2.jpg' (116 KB)
Preview of image 'swirl2.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tim Attwood" <tim### [at] comcast net> schreef in bericht
news:47551e2a@news.povray.org...
> At first I liked this, but now I don't.
> I'm not sure why, maybe it's too red,
> or too simple to code, or just too much
> like other "modern" paintings.
It reminds me of the work of a French painter in the 1960's. I forgot his
I like it, anyway.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tim Attwood" <tim### [at] comcastnet> wrote:
> At first I liked this, but now I don't.
> I'm not sure why, maybe it's too red,
> or too simple to code, or just too much
> like other "modern" paintings.
You dont like it??? I'm amazed with this picture, the strange texture and 3D
effect the painting has... how do you get it? is it a heighfield?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
You could make a nice Jackson Pollock with these routines, just add mooore
paint, swirl, pieces of glass from broken liquor bottles, rests of
cigarettes etc... ;-)
see
http://www.tate.org.uk/servlet/ViewWork?cgroupid=999999961&workid=12149&searchid=9326&tabview=image
"Tim Attwood" <tim### [at] comcastnet> wrote in message
news:47551e2a@news.povray.org...
> At first I liked this, but now I don't.
> I'm not sure why, maybe it's too red,
> or too simple to code, or just too much
> like other "modern" paintings.
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> You dont like it??? I'm amazed with this picture, the strange texture and
> 3D
> effect the painting has... how do you get it? is it a heighfield?
>
Yeah, it's a heightfield with a gradient y color map.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot wrote:
>
> It reminds me of the work of a French painter in the 1960's.
Jean-Paul Riopelle ?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jim Charter" <jrc### [at] msncom> schreef in bericht
news:4757503d$1@news.povray.org...
> Thomas de Groot wrote:
>
>>
>> It reminds me of the work of a French painter in the 1960's.
> Jean-Paul Riopelle ?
Well, he is close indeed, but it is not him. I shall have to dig deep in
memory...
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
news: 4757ae33$1@news.povray.org...
> Well, he is close indeed, but it is not him. I shall have to dig deep in
> memory...
Georges Mathieu
http://wwar.com/masters/m/mathieu-georges.html
He was quite famous in the 60-70s because he got a lot of public commissions
(stamps, coins, logotypes etc.), so his work is somehow familiar in France
even though people have forgotten his name.
G.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Gilles Tran" <gil### [at] agroparistechfr> schreef in bericht
news:4757b22d$1@news.povray.org...
>
> news: 4757ae33$1@news.povray.org...
>> Well, he is close indeed, but it is not him. I shall have to dig deep in
>> memory...
>
> Georges Mathieu
> http://wwar.com/masters/m/mathieu-georges.html
> He was quite famous in the 60-70s because he got a lot of public
> commissions (stamps, coins, logotypes etc.), so his work is somehow
> familiar in France even though people have forgotten his name.
>
>
Gilles! You are the greatest! :-)
Georges Mathieu was the name I was desperately trying to dig up out of my
memory!!! Thanks!
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot wrote:
> "Gilles Tran" <gil### [at] agroparistechfr> schreef in bericht
> news:4757b22d$1@news.povray.org...
>
>>news: 4757ae33$1@news.povray.org...
>>
>>>Well, he is close indeed, but it is not him. I shall have to dig deep in
>>>memory...
>>
>>Georges Mathieu
>>http://wwar.com/masters/m/mathieu-georges.html
>>He was quite famous in the 60-70s because he got a lot of public
>>commissions (stamps, coins, logotypes etc.), so his work is somehow
>>familiar in France even though people have forgotten his name.
>>
>>
>
>
> Gilles! You are the greatest! :-)
>
> Georges Mathieu was the name I was desperately trying to dig up out of my
> memory!!! Thanks!
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
Yes yes, isn't there a documentary of him dressing up in a conquistador
costume to paint an abstract rendition of a period battle? I have this
dim memory of something like that.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
