 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I have returned to last year's 'Eavesdropping', with the new figures I have
been working on for the last couple of months. This is a fast,
non-radiosity, render.
The title could now be: "Iskander learns something to his advantage".
Besides Iskander, the other figures are the Rais Abdul ibn Abdullah (of
course), and a newcomer: captain Adamastor. The place is the city of
Gancaloon, gate to the world of dreams.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Eavesdropping.jpg' (131 KB)
Preview of image 'Eavesdropping.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
My compliments on your picture. The ropes are especially interesting to me.
Would you mind sharing your technique for creating them? Maybe even share
the source code?
Regards,
Dave
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Dave Blandston" <nomail@nomail> schreef in bericht
news:web.46ac9a42160602482f98a5e30@news.povray.org...
> My compliments on your picture. The ropes are especially interesting to
> me.
> Would you mind sharing your technique for creating them? Maybe even share
> the source code?
>
Thank you indeed, Dave.
The rope macro is by Mike Williams, which I gladly acknowledge here. :-)
You can find Mike's rope macro here:
http://www.econym.demon.co.uk/pov/rope.htm
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> http://www.econym.demon.co.uk/pov/rope.htm
Very ambitious, looks very nice.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] inter nlDOTnet> wrote:
> I have returned to last year's 'Eavesdropping', with the new figures I have
> been working on for the last couple of months. This is a fast,
> non-radiosity, render.
This is coming along nicely. Will we see a glimpse of Cathy skipping along
the quay?
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen" <mcavoys_AT_aolDOT.com> schreef in bericht
news:web.46af290816060248c4e49fa40@news.povray.org...
> "Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet> wrote:
>> I have returned to last year's 'Eavesdropping', with the new figures I
>> have
>> been working on for the last couple of months. This is a fast,
>> non-radiosity, render.
>
>
> This is coming along nicely. Will we see a glimpse of Cathy skipping along
> the quay?
>
Hmm... No Cathy in this scene I'm afraid. However, in another one I am
planning, she might indeed appear as one of her avatars. Excellent idea
Stephen!
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet> wrote:
> Hmm... No Cathy in this scene I'm afraid. However, in another one I am
> planning, she might indeed appear as one of her avatars. Excellent idea
> Stephen!
>
> Thomas
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen" <mcavoys_AT_aolDOT.com> schreef in bericht
news:web.46af4fe116060248c4e49fa40@news.povray.org...
> "Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlDOTnet> wrote:
>
>> Hmm... No Cathy in this scene I'm afraid. However, in another one I am
>> planning, she might indeed appear as one of her avatars. Excellent idea
>> Stephen!
>>
>> Thomas
>
> I thought that it might be a trademark. "Find Cathy in Thomas's image" :-)
>
Indeed! Your earlier suggestion has given me an idea, and Cathy is going to
appear in this scene. Just wait and see...
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas de Groot wrote:
>
Excellent.
Realist full-scenes often impress on a computer screen, but there are
few I can imagine printed on a wall. Realist full-scenes seem so dry in
comparison to abstract, impressionist, or still-life works. This one
will be an exception if you can get an attractive render.
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Thomas de Groot
Subject: Re: Eavesdropping - new WIP (~130kB)
Date: 11 Aug 2007 03:06:09
Message: <46bd5fe1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Shay" <shay@s.s> schreef in bericht news:46bcab00$1@news.povray.org...
> Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>
>
> Excellent.
Thank you, Shay !
>
> Realist full-scenes often impress on a computer screen, but there are
> few I can imagine printed on a wall. Realist full-scenes seem so dry in
> comparison to abstract, impressionist, or still-life works. This one
> will be an exception if you can get an attractive render.
>
I fully agree. A distinction should be made indeed and these kind of
images/scenes, in my view, are not intended to be hanging on a wall. At
best, they illustrate a story - which is tricky in itself - or they serve as
a basis for a story. They have no function whatsoever on a wall because they
would be rapidly boring and disappointing. I am, at heart, a storyteller and
not a painter. As such, these scenes are the materializations of visions
from my mind's eye.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
