 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The wall was plain so I put something on it.
Regards,
John
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'mandel.jpg' (166 KB)
Preview of image 'mandel.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi John,
nature is the only pure artist ....
Nice pic in the grey world ;-)
Regards,
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Forget that! I'm waiting for Zazzle to start telling custom wallpaper! >:-D
You *know* what my bedroom is going to look like...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v3 <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> You *know* what my bedroom is going to look like...
John, Was the fractal done in Pov-Ray? Nice image BTW
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
John VanSickle wrote:
> The wall was plain so I put something on it.
Mandelbrot with exponent 6?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
John VanSickle wrote:
> The wall was plain so I put something on it.
>
This reminds me, indirectly, of a minor artist named Richard Tuttle.
Tuttle did sculptures. He would paste fairly large pieces of paper,
maybe 50 inches or so across, and in a fairly simple geometric shape,
never too far from rectangular, onto a wall. White paper, white wall.
The wall might be in some institutional setting, say a university
library. As time progressed, the wall would receive new coats of paint
but the painters would have to paint around the Tuttle sculpture. So
after time the wall would look fresh and new, while the papered area
would become a respository of dirt and scuffs etc.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Warp wrote:
> John VanSickle wrote:
>
>>The wall was plain so I put something on it.
>
>
> Mandelbrot with exponent 6?
Correct. The main shape has perfect five-fold symmetry (which is why I
chose that exponent), but the floaters are usually distorted like the
biggest one shown here.
Regards,
John
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: John VanSickle
Subject: Re: Just decorating a scene (166kbbu)
Date: 16 Jun 2007 19:44:42
Message: <467475ea@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> Orchid XP v3 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>
>
>>You *know* what my bedroom is going to look like...
>
>
>
> John, Was the fractal done in Pov-Ray? Nice image BTW
Yes. There are a total of nine objects in the picture, including the
frame. The pigment for the picture is a mandel pattern; there's no
image_map involved. It's a cheap and easy way to put something
decorative on the wall in a scene.
Regards,
John
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sat, 16 Jun 2007 19:44:40 -0400, John VanSickle <evi### [at] hotmailcom>
wrote:
>
>Yes. There are a total of nine objects in the picture, including the
>frame. The pigment for the picture is a mandel pattern; there's no
>image_map involved. It's a cheap and easy way to put something
>decorative on the wall in a scene.
Nice
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
