 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Still playin' with my opals. In my last render with opals, I used a
reflective metal finish on the 'flakes' inside the opal, but this time I've
used glass instead and it seems as though it works better in this image.
(Well, it would make sense, at least).
Anyway, is this the style Stephen?
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'opal_signet.jpg' (120 KB)
Preview of image 'opal_signet.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"St." <dot### [at] dot com> wrote:
> Still playin' with my opals. In my last render with opals, I used a
> reflective metal finish on the 'flakes' inside the opal, but this time I've
> used glass instead and it seems as though it works better in this image.
> (Well, it would make sense, at least).
>
> Anyway, is this the style Stephen?
>
> ~Steve~
You could have drawn the blinds before you took the photo, as the
reflections are distracting :-)
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nice concept, nice composition
The tall position of background ring looks a few unreal
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Stephen" <mcavoys_AT_aolDOT.com> wrote in message
news:web.45dea634a9b04fdcf1cb1e660@news.povray.org...
> "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
> It looks good so the cheque's in the post :-)
Cool, then this is what I'll make.
>
> You could have drawn the blinds before you took the photo, as the
> reflections are distracting :-)
Lol! Me doing Awsome Rolex images? That would be the day... :o)
>
> I like, what looks like chevrons at 7 o'clock. Interesting, a bit of fire.
Yes, an accident I think, but a welcome one.
~Steve~
>
>
> Stephen
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Agustin Britait Molina" <agu### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:web.45deb870a9b04fdc8e5923000@news.povray.org...
> Nice concept, nice composition
Thank you.
>
> The tall position of background ring looks a few unreal
I'm not sure what you mean? Do you mean the actual height of the ring?
~Steve~
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:54:05 -0000, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>
>"Stephen" <mcavoys_AT_aolDOT.com> wrote in message
>news:web.45dea634a9b04fdcf1cb1e660@news.povray.org...
>> "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>
>> It looks good so the cheque's in the post :-)
>
> Cool, then this is what I'll make.
Yes, please do.
>>
>> You could have drawn the blinds before you took the photo, as the
>> reflections are distracting :-)
>
> Lol! Me doing Awsome Rolex images? That would be the day... :o)
>
I think it is pretty good.
>
>>
>> I like, what looks like chevrons at 7 o'clock. Interesting, a bit of fire.
>
> Yes, an accident I think, but a welcome one.
>
Yes
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
> "Agustin Britait Molina" <agu### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
> news:web.45deb870a9b04fdc8e5923000@news.povray.org...
> > Nice concept, nice composition
>
> Thank you.
>
> >
> > The tall position of background ring looks a few unreal
>
> I'm not sure what you mean? Do you mean the actual height of the ring?
>
> ~Steve~
>
>
> >
> >
Could be the fact that the ring is balancing upright?
Nice image!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. wrote:
Nice ring, and opal is my birthstone, though I was under the impression
that opals are too soft for this kind of setting. ??
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Shay" <not### [at] notmailcom> wrote in message
news:45e1b6d4@news.povray.org...
> St. wrote:
>
> Nice ring, and opal is my birthstone, though I was under the impression
> that opals are too soft for this kind of setting. ??
Well, they are. :)
But, you gotta know what you're doing... ;)
Nice to see you around Shay.
~Steve~
>
> -Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
