|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Since this is my first post, I figured I had to take on the epic "Chrome
Sphere on Checkered Plane" that begins all good POV-ing careers. This
particular version uses scattering media (type 4), focal blur, blurred
reflection, and radiosity. Needless to say, it took a long time to
render (I'd hazard to guess it was around 20 hours for this resolution -
I'd give more precise data, but the computer crashed sometime after it
completed but before I got to access it again).
Because I'm impatient, some of the quality settings were inadequate. I
got rid of most of them with some simple GIMPing - despeckle tackled the
persistent focal blur artifacts that kept occuring quite well, but the
image isn't vanilla :( Name and date were also added with the GIMP.
Nothing else was changed.
Enjoy!
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'sphere1-pp.jpg' (41 KB)
Preview of image 'sphere1-pp.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That is really rather nice.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nice image, but 20 hours seems a bit extreme even with all of the eye candy.
Care to post the source so that I can try it on my compy?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Billy R. wrote:
> Nice image, but 20 hours seems a bit extreme even with all of the eye candy.
To think it was done on a relatively new PC too (PD 3.0GHz, 2GB RAM).
> Care to post the source so that I can try it on my compy?
I'll tidy it up and post it to p.t.s-f in a few minutes.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Peter Hokanson <pho### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> Since this is my first post, I figured I had to take on the epic "Chrome
> Sphere on Checkered Plane" that begins all good POV-ing careers. This
> particular version uses scattering media (type 4), focal blur, blurred
> reflection, and radiosity. Needless to say, it took a long time to
> render (I'd hazard to guess it was around 20 hours for this resolution -
> I'd give more precise data, but the computer crashed sometime after it
> completed but before I got to access it again).
>
> Because I'm impatient, some of the quality settings were inadequate. I
> got rid of most of them with some simple GIMPing - despeckle tackled the
> persistent focal blur artifacts that kept occuring quite well, but the
> image isn't vanilla :( Name and date were also added with the GIMP.
> Nothing else was changed.
>
> Enjoy!
This is one of the best RSOCP images I have seen in a while. I like the
camera angle and the tiles look really good. This is what raytracing was
made for..
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
s.day wrote:
> This is one of the best RSOCP images I have seen in a while. I like the
> camera angle and the tiles look really good. This is what raytracing was
> made for..
Thanks! I tried to work on the "composition" aspect of the piece rather
than just cramming in features. That said, I used a lot of them, and
render times are known to increase exponentially with such applications.
I think what I've learned in my art class this semester has really
helped :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Nice image, but 20 hours seems a bit extreme even with all of the eye candy.
>
> Care to post the source so that I can try it on my compy?
Focal blur. It takes insane settings to make it look good...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v3 wrote:
> Focal blur. It takes insane settings to make it look good...
Or just use a smaller aperture. Overabuse of focal blur is
out of fashion. A smaller aperture and consequently a more
subtle focal blur may give much better results. :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>"Peter Hokanson" <pho### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> Since this is my first post, I figured I had to take on the epic "Chrome
> Sphere on Checkered Plane" that begins all good POV-ing careers. This
> particular version uses scattering media (type 4), focal blur, blurred
> reflection, and radiosity. Needless to say, it took a long time to
> render (I'd hazard to guess it was around 20 hours for this resolution -
> I'd give more precise data, but the computer crashed sometime after it
> completed but before I got to access it again).
It is a living scene: i like a lot the "touch and feel" of the floor
expecially.
> Because I'm impatient, some of the quality settings were inadequate. I
> got rid of most of them with some simple GIMPing - despeckle tackled the
> persistent focal blur artifacts that kept occuring quite well, but the
> image isn't vanilla :( Name and date were also added with the GIMP.
> Nothing else was changed.
>
> Enjoy!
>
Everyone loves the GIMP ;-) but there is surely a way to do it using only
POV-ray...
Nice work,
;-)
Paolo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Paolo Gibellini wrote:
> Everyone loves the GIMP ;-) but there is surely a way to do it using only
> POV-ray...
There is, but it would take forever. It's the focal blur, as was noted
earlier. I posted the source, feel free to experiment with it. Don't
expect it to render quickly, though.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |