|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Done...
I'm still learning to use POV-RAY, so there are many things to improve...
Source code on http://croquis.over-blog.com (in french)
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Babel.jpg' (516 KB)
Preview of image 'Babel.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Mr Seb" <ban### [at] wanadoofr> wrote:
> Done...
> I'm still learning to use POV-RAY, so there are many things to improve...
Don't worry, you're doing quite well! There are lots of interesting parts
to your image...a good exercise in different POV techniques.
I kind of assume you were trying to get a yellow-to-tan color for the
stonework, rather than slightly greenish? Yellow seems to be a problematic
color in CGI; I've seen lots of *professional* work, especially on TV, that
shows the same problem. I usually use rgb <1,.75,*whatever*> as a starting
point, rather than rgb <1,1,0>--which SHOULD be pure yellow but just
doesn't look like it ( well, not the way I think it should look, anyway.)
Ken W.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks for your comments and your advice.
Indeed, my yellow is a bit greenish (that wasn't the case on my bad laptop
screen...), but I've found why : radiosity effect with the blue sky. I
forgot this detail.
news:web.448e6c6842753440d311dd050@news.povray.org...
> "Mr Seb" <ban### [at] wanadoofr> wrote:
> > Done...
> > I'm still learning to use POV-RAY, so there are many things to
improve...
>
> Don't worry, you're doing quite well! There are lots of interesting parts
> to your image...a good exercise in different POV techniques.
>
> I kind of assume you were trying to get a yellow-to-tan color for the
> stonework, rather than slightly greenish? Yellow seems to be a problematic
> color in CGI; I've seen lots of *professional* work, especially on TV,
that
> shows the same problem. I usually use rgb <1,.75,*whatever*> as a
starting
> point, rather than rgb <1,1,0>--which SHOULD be pure yellow but just
> doesn't look like it ( well, not the way I think it should look, anyway.)
>
> Ken W.
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|