|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Same scene, but this time I moved the focal point to the surface of the
sphere and changed some other focal blur settings. Overall, I think
this one looks far better than the other one.
-DJ
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'rsocp_fp_rev.png' (249 KB)
Preview of image 'rsocp_fp_rev.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
DJ Wiza wrote:
> Same scene, but this time I moved the focal point to the surface of the
> sphere and changed some other focal blur settings. Overall, I think
> this one looks far better than the other one.
Yes, this is really good. I would maybe decrease the amount of focal
blur a little, and definitely add radiosity. The bottom part of the
reflective sphere looks a bit flat without it.
/ martin
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Martin Magnusson wrote:
> DJ Wiza wrote:
>
>> Same scene, but this time I moved the focal point to the surface of
>> the sphere and changed some other focal blur settings. Overall, I
>> think this one looks far better than the other one.
>
>
> Yes, this is really good. I would maybe decrease the amount of focal
> blur a little, and definitely add radiosity. The bottom part of the
> reflective sphere looks a bit flat without it.
>
> / martin
There actually *IS* radiosity in the image. The only light source is
the sky_sphere.
-DJ
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |