 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
An image I did a while ago.
I thought the outcome wasn't all that bad
--
Ger
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'frame-005.jpg' (97 KB)
Preview of image 'frame-005.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Ger" <No.### [at] Thank You> wrote in message news:43d41089@news.povray.org...
> An image I did a while ago.
> I thought the outcome wasn't all that bad
Bl**dy hell! Put that PoVRay (Wings?) down, and get on with your day
job Ger! :o)
Fair play to you, that's a lot of work gone into this scene. Almost
brought a tear to my eye as I've worked on those very machines...
Now you need a Hardinge precision lathe next to those swarf bins...
http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/modelshop/MACHINES/hardinge.jpg :o)
Excellent work, but it needs a little dirt... all over it. ;)
~Steve~
>
>
> --
> Ger
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. wrote:
>
>
> Bl**dy hell! Put that PoVRay (Wings?) down, and get on with your day
> job Ger! :o)
Pure PovRay SDL, no Wings or whatever.
>
> Fair play to you, that's a lot of work gone into this scene.
I can't even begin to count the hours that went into it. Mostly because it's
one of those on-going projects. (Must have started 3-4 years ago)
> Almost brought a tear to my eye as I've worked on those very
machines...
>
Same here, that's why I know them so well :)
> Now you need a Hardinge precision lathe next to those swarf bins...
> http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/modelshop/MACHINES/hardinge.jpg :o)
>
> Excellent work, but it needs a little dirt... all over it. ;)
>
But, but, I have spend all this time cleaning that place :)
>
> ~Steve~
--
Ger
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Ger" <No.### [at] ThankYou> wrote in message news:43d428cb@news.povray.org...
> St. wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Bl**dy hell! Put that PoVRay (Wings?) down, and get on with your day
>> job Ger! :o)
>
> Pure PovRay SDL, no Wings or whatever.
That's excellent work then. I'm impressed!
>> ...but it needs a little dirt... all over it. ;)
>>
>
> But, but, I have spend all this time cleaning that place :)
:o)
To be fair, our workshop was as clean as that, it was just the floor that
was dirty.
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 00:07:59 +0100, Ger <No.### [at] ThankYou> wrote:
>An image I did a while ago.
>I thought the outcome wasn't all that bad
Excellent image and modeling. Steve might have worked on these
machines but I've walked past them many times. Beside the dirt and
stains the only thing missing is a bench vise.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 00:07:59 +0100, Ger <No.### [at] ThankYou> wrote:
>
>>An image I did a while ago.
>>I thought the outcome wasn't all that bad
>
> Excellent image and modeling. Steve might have worked on these
> machines but I've walked past them many times. Beside the dirt and
> stains the only thing missing is a bench vise.
> A scene for the old school, I think.
The vise is off camera to the right :)
--
Ger
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 12:00:07 +0100, Ger <No.### [at] ThankYou> wrote:
>
>The vise is off camera to the right :)
>
I should have realised :-)
Your safety screen, what is it? It can't be glass (safety or not)
surely? Perspex would be scored. BTW your point lights are showing in
the reflection. How long did it take to render? And how long using
would area lights take? :-)
All we need is the smell, now.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 12:00:07 +0100, Ger <No.### [at] ThankYou> wrote:
>
>>
>>The vise is off camera to the right :)
>>
>
> I should have realised :-)
>
> Your safety screen, what is it? It can't be glass (safety or not)
> surely? Perspex would be scored.
It's "trouble avoiding, self thinking, intelligent" glass :)
> BTW your point lights are showing in
> the reflection. How long did it take to render? And how long using
> would area lights take? :-)
If memory serves me well this one took about 16 hours (at 1600x900)
I remember stopping the render with 15 lights per tube after ~24 hours.
> All we need is the smell, now.
This feature will be implemented in PovRay v14 and a half :)
--
Ger
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 13:53:58 +0100, Ger <No.### [at] ThankYou> wrote:
>
>It's "trouble avoiding, self thinking, intelligent" glass :)
As if you could afford high end mil specs :-)
>> BTW your point lights are showing in
>> the reflection. How long did it take to render? And how long using
>> would area lights take? :-)
>
>If memory serves me well this one took about 16 hours (at 1600x900)
>I remember stopping the render with 15 lights per tube after ~24 hours.
It is time that we had an other leap in computer power :-)
>> All we need is the smell, now.
>This feature will be implemented in PovRay v14 and a half :)
I developed a patch for this, but I could only get the bad smell of
envy :-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
>
> It is time that we had an other leap in computer power :-)
>
Running a PII 350, so yes, I think there's some room for improvement ;)
--
Ger
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
