 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
A two tone engagement ring. Those triquetra's were hard to do, but I got
there in the end...
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'red_setting.jpg' (56 KB)
Preview of image 'red_setting.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
news:43c79e0c@news.povray.org...
> A two tone engagement ring. Those triquetra's were hard to do, but I got
> there in the end...
>
> ~Steve~
>
18 cents? not very expensive ;-)
Very well modelled (Wings?)
Marc
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Marc Jacquier" <jac### [at] wanadoo fr> wrote in message
news:43c7bb74$1@news.povray.org...
> news:43c79e0c@news.povray.org...
>> A two tone engagement ring. Those triquetra's were hard to do, but I got
>> there in the end...
>>
>> ~Steve~
>>
> 18 cents? not very expensive ;-)
set into that ring. :-O
> Very well modelled (Wings?)
Thanks, yes, Wings. I can't get enough of it. :o)
~Steve~
>
> Marc
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. wrote:
> A two tone engagement ring. Those triquetra's were hard to do, but I got
> there in the end...
>
> ~Steve~
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Nice one, Steve. Great modelling, great texturing.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 13/01/2006 07:33:
> A two tone engagement ring. Those triquetra's were hard to do, but I got
> there in the end...
>
> ~Steve~
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Great
Now, you need photons with dispersion.
--
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
Fine day to work off excess energy. Steal something heavy.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. wrote:
> A two tone engagement ring. Those triquetra's were hard to do, but I got
> there in the end...
G'day Steve,
Those triquetras are indeed impressive. You've managed to capture the
feel of the gold as it's shaped into the complex mould.
I'm also enchanted by the two-tones .. but I'd like to see something in
the transition .. even if it's just a torus (I'm sure there's a
professional term for it in the jewellry trade) made from one or the
other to mark the change.
I can't wait for you to turn on the photons now :)
You've inspired me to get back to my black pearls!
Cheers!
Rick Measham
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Left ring: Yellow, rose, and white gold. Right ring: Yellow and white gold.
Bog-standard photons were used, but no cigar.
Can anyone tell me what settings are best for photons?
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'shank4.jpg' (152 KB)
Preview of image 'shank4.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Rick Measham" <rickm*at%isite.net.au> wrote in message
news:43c8bd04$1@news.povray.org...
> St. wrote:
>> A two tone engagement ring. Those triquetra's were hard to do, but I got
>> there in the end...
>
> G'day Steve,
G'day Rick!
> Those triquetras are indeed impressive. You've managed to capture the feel
> of the gold as it's shaped into the complex mould.
Thanks! The one celtic shoulder took me about 2 hours to complete, and
the rest was fairly simple.
>
> I'm also enchanted by the two-tones .. but I'd like to see something in
> the transition .. even if it's just a torus (I'm sure there's a
> professional term for it in the jewellry trade) made from one or the other
> to mark the change.
Well, there is no term really, apart from on the left ring posted, it
would be called a 'bar', or if there's two per shoulder, it would be
'double-bar'. On the right ring, one could also file two grooves, but the
first image I posted is also viable.
>
> I can't wait for you to turn on the photons now :)
I have in the next image, but after 20 hrs and 19 minutes, I've failed
abysmally. I just can't get photons right. :/
>
> You've inspired me to get back to my black pearls!
Hey thanks! It's nice to know that *I* can inspire someone for a change,
instead of the other way 'round! :o)
Looking forward to those pearls!
~Steve~
>
> Cheers!
> Rick Measham
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jim Charter" <jrc### [at] msncom> wrote in message
news:43c7db51$1@news.povray.org...
> Nice one, Steve. Great modelling, great texturing.
Thank you Jim! :o)
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Alain" <ele### [at] netscapenet> wrote in message
news:43c853fa$1@news.povray.org...
> St. nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 13/01/2006 07:33:
>> A two tone engagement ring. Those triquetra's were hard to do, but I got
>> there in the end...
>>
>> ~Steve~
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
> Great
Thanks!
> Now, you need photons with dispersion.
I used this in my latest image:
interior {ior 2.4 caustics .5 dispersion 1.05
dispersion_samples 20 }}
So where am I going wrong? What do I need to do?
~Steve~
>
> --
> Alain
> -------------------------------------------------
> Fine day to work off excess energy. Steal something heavy.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
