|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f903c/f903c3bb608a7c7b06b07609b48e3262f6c5391e" alt="" |
"Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] inter nl net> wrote in message
news:43a12b67@news.povray.org...
>
> I would not consider *more stuff* here. I have the impression that the
> scene
> should remain rather empty. perhaps the suggestion on the right of a
> cupboard or something? Just the shadow on the wall...
> Yes the shadow of table and chair feet is annoying. That is a radiosity
> issue I believe. Not sure how to correct that. I am also still learning by
> trial and error how to use it correctly in each scene...
Jim seems to agree that more objects would not necessarily enhance the
scene. I like your idea of a shadow of some kind. In fact, I may add
shadows to other parts of the image as well. I guess it all depends on how
well Radiosity works for situations where most of the lighting is indirect.
Or, I may have to "fake" some of the radiosity, by introducing other broad
light sources. Either way, very little scripting, lots of rendering.
> Strangely enough, I just had the vision of an old woman, who was sitting
> on
> the chair, contemplating the sunset, and who got up and stepped away just
> before you took the snapshot!
> There is an atmosphere of an invisible presence in this scene, other than
> the beholder.
Or was she there 100 years ago and just never came back? Ok, the dust would
be bad... ;-)
Thanks for the comment. It gives me a few more ideas. Rest assured, I
won't be doing anything very radical to this scene, but I would like to
reuse these objects and this environment in other scenes, if/when I get
inspired to do so.
Well, I've got a lot of technical issues to mess around with. It's times
like this that having Tortoise CVS managing my source is handy.
Post a reply to this message
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f903c/f903c3bb608a7c7b06b07609b48e3262f6c5391e" alt="" |