 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I like this better and better.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'AtmosphericMedia2a.jpg' (53 KB)
Preview of image 'AtmosphericMedia2a.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Wow, this sure has changed since the first time I saw it. I really like the
way only a few of the lights are on. Very contrasty now, too.
Not sure if you noticed on your monitor that there is a ladder rung artifact
where the hatchway door is at, looks like either media sampling caused it,
or maybe the area_light + media. My LCD screen shows it up easily when
tilted.
I still think the sky (or whatever is above) should be brighter, since eyes
would adjust to the darkness in this tunnel and the light beaming through
the gratings would probably appear artificially intensified. Thing is, if
that were done it would likely need an overglow added.
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I like this better and better.
Me too! Massive improvement over the original. The lighting is great. I
agree with Bob that the sky (and maybe the sun light source) still needs to
be brighter.
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
so I increase the samples to get rid of that ladder effect?
"Slime" <fak### [at] email address> wrote in message
news:42eee289$1@news.povray.org...
>> I like this better and better.
>
>
> Me too! Massive improvement over the original. The lighting is great. I
> agree with Bob that the sky (and maybe the sun light source) still needs
> to
> be brighter.
>
> - Slime
> [ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> so I increase the samples to get rid of that ladder effect?
Worth a shot.
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
the Samples was already set at 50,400, but I can bump that up again...
"Slime" <fak### [at] emailaddress> wrote in message
news:42ef0f88$1@news.povray.org...
> > so I increase the samples to get rid of that ladder effect?
>
> Worth a shot.
>
> - Slime
> [ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Bryan Valencia" <pov### [at] spamgourmetcom> wrote in message
news:42eeab4e@news.povray.org...
> I like this better and better.
>
>
>
infinitely better than your original posting. nice progress!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> the Samples was already set at 50,400, but I can bump that up again...
If you're using sampling method 3 (the default), the 400 is irrelevant and
you can replace that with "samples 50".
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
You should! Much, much improved from where you started.
"Bryan Valencia" <pov### [at] spamgourmetcom> wrote:
> I like this better and better.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This is with "samples 100"
"Slime" <fak### [at] emailaddress> wrote in message
news:42efc778@news.povray.org...
> > the Samples was already set at 50,400, but I can bump that up again...
>
>
> If you're using sampling method 3 (the default), the 400 is irrelevant and
> you can replace that with "samples 50".
>
> - Slime
> [ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
>
>
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'AtmosphericMedia2b.jpg' (48 KB)
Preview of image 'AtmosphericMedia2b.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
