 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'img.0028.jpg' (23 KB)
Preview of image 'img.0028.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jim Charter" <jrc### [at] msn com> wrote in message
news:42dc1dbc@news.povray.org...
>Subject: Re: 44.9.38
Amazing Jim. You're 8 minutes ahead of the time I have here in the uk: 44
days: 9 hours: 30 minutes...
Definately minimal image and quite intriguing.
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. wrote:
>
> "Jim Charter" <jrc### [at] msncom> wrote in message
> news:42dc1dbc@news.povray.org...
>
> >Subject: Re: 44.9.38
>
> Amazing Jim. You're 8 minutes ahead of the time I have here in the uk:
> 44 days: 9 hours: 30 minutes...
>
> Definately minimal image and quite intriguing.
>
Thanks
Time always disorients me but the numbers reflect a countdown. So if
you loaded the page 8 min after I did your minute number should be 8
less than my number all else being equal. Not sure if that is what you
are observing.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jim Charter" <jrc### [at] msncom> wrote in message
news:42dc2ed0$1@news.povray.org...
> St. wrote:
>>
>> "Jim Charter" <jrc### [at] msncom> wrote in message
>> news:42dc1dbc@news.povray.org...
>>
>> >Subject: Re: 44.9.38
>>
>> Amazing Jim. You're 8 minutes ahead of the time I have here in the uk:
>> 44 days: 9 hours: 30 minutes...
>>
>> Definately minimal image and quite intriguing.
>>
> Thanks
>
> Time always disorients me but the numbers reflect a countdown. So if you
> loaded the page 8 min after I did your minute number should be 8 less than
> my number all else being equal. Not sure if that is what you are
> observing.
Yeah, I see what you're saying, but I thought you guys were 'hours' behind
us time-wise. I simply didn't see the obvious.
Bleh... ;)
Anyway, how did you do this?
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. wrote:
>
> "Jim Charter" <jrc### [at] msncom> wrote in message
> news:42dc2ed0$1@news.povray.org...
>
>> St. wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Jim Charter" <jrc### [at] msncom> wrote in message
>>> news:42dc1dbc@news.povray.org...
>>>
>>> >Subject: Re: 44.9.38
>>>
>>> Amazing Jim. You're 8 minutes ahead of the time I have here in the
>>> uk: 44 days: 9 hours: 30 minutes...
>>>
>>> Definately minimal image and quite intriguing.
>>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Time always disorients me but the numbers reflect a countdown. So if
>> you loaded the page 8 min after I did your minute number should be 8
>> less than my number all else being equal. Not sure if that is what
>> you are observing.
>
>
> Yeah, I see what you're saying, but I thought you guys were 'hours'
> behind us time-wise. I simply didn't see the obvious.
>
> Bleh... ;)
>
> Anyway, how did you do this?
>
> ~Steve~
>
>
It is just a box with media in it filled with a matrix of point_lights,
Then another box and another matrix placed such that it would roughly
"mirror" the first from the particular camera angle.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jim Charter" <jrc### [at] msncom> wrote in message
news:42dc3c3e@news.povray.org...
> It is just a box with media in it filled with a matrix of point_lights,
> Then another box and another matrix placed such that it would roughly
> "mirror" the first from the particular camera angle.
Shoot. :/ I've got to give up Poving. I'll never have the time to do
stuff like that.
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I love it. First thing I've seen that (to me) looks minimalist, artistically
interesting, and technically competent, all at the same time. I would
happily and a big one on my wall, and happily vote for it come IRTC
deadline.
-s
5TF!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
stm31415 wrote:
> I love it. First thing I've seen that (to me) looks minimalist, artistically
> interesting, and technically competent, all at the same time. I would
> happily and a big one on my wall, and happily vote for it come IRTC
> deadline.
>
>
> -s
> 5TF!
>
Thanks, but of course the IRTC topic is "minimalism." The topic can be
addressed by producing a work that might actually be categorized as
"minimalist" in the art historical sense, but in a lot of other ways too.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. wrote:
>
> "Jim Charter" <jrc### [at] msncom> wrote in message
> news:42dc3c3e@news.povray.org...
>
>> It is just a box with media in it filled with a matrix of
>> point_lights, Then another box and another matrix placed such that it
>> would roughly "mirror" the first from the particular camera angle.
>
>
> Shoot. :/ I've got to give up Poving. I'll never have the time to do
> stuff like that.
>
> ~Steve~
>
>
>
>
lol well you know, just do the stuff you have time for when you have
time for it... which I guess is *never*, but somehow we march on.
This code is pretty simple, but I happen to have been doing some media
recently, so the syntax was at the fore of my mind. Now is really the
first time I have gotten into media in any involved way, and it is all
because I wanted to try and *model* that stupid shark. But then the
shark needs to be in water, and so then you have interior with media and
...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> >
> Thanks, but of course the IRTC topic is "minimalism." The topic can be
> addressed by producing a work that might actually be categorized as
> "minimalist" in the art historical sense, but in a lot of other ways too.
Of course. I'm waiting with baited breath for the *other* interpretations.
Doesn't keep me from likeing this one :)
-s
5TF!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
