51 days?! Why did it take that long? It looks cool, but a bunch of letters
alone shouldn't cause such a long render time.
- Slime
[ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]
From: Jim Charter
Subject: Re: 51 days, 10 hours, 18 minutes [83 kb]
Date: 11 Jul 2005 17:52:33
Message: <42d2ea21$1@news.povray.org>
Slime wrote:
> 51 days?! Why did it take that long? It looks cool, but a bunch of letters> alone shouldn't cause such a long render time.
"deadline is in...at the time this page was loaded"
"Slime" <fak### [at] emailaddress> wrote in message
news:42d2dcc9$1@news.povray.org...
> 51 days?! Why did it take that long? It looks cool, but a bunch of letters> alone shouldn't cause such a long render time.
I don't think it did take that long Slime. I think Jim is playing
around with Minimalism in a 'different' way... ;)
It's a clock, measuring time, and it finally reached its most minimal
time to produce the image required.
Just my opinion though... And I'm probably wrong.
Nice image Jim. :)
~Steve~
>> - Slime> [ http://www.slimeland.com/ ]>>
address> wrote in message
news: