|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi folks !
This is my first post here :) Never dare do it before. It's no gorgeous
picture but i was especially happy of it : it's one of the scene i used
to debug next version of Truevision ( 0.5.4 - coming soon ! ) So i'm
just happy of the work we made on the modeller. Firt scene ( a few years
ago ) was a yellow box and ... nothing else. Still csg only but almost
all objects will be there in 0.5.4. All comments are welcome :)
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'moulin.jpg' (46 KB)
Preview of image 'moulin.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Pas mal ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Vincent LE PRINCE nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2005-05-22 00:02:
> Hi folks !
>
> This is my first post here :) Never dare do it before. It's no
> gorgeous picture but i was especially happy of it : it's one of the
> scene i used to debug next version of Truevision ( 0.5.4 - coming soon !
> ) So i'm just happy of the work we made on the modeller. Firt scene ( a
> few years ago ) was a yellow box and ... nothing else. Still csg only
> but almost all objects will be there in 0.5.4. All comments are welcome :)
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
The one my parents had when I was young had a flat crank with a square section about 3
times as
whide as the axis with an hex bolt to holt it in place. Also, the handles were red.
Alain
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Vincent LE PRINCE <vin### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> Hi folks !
>
> This is my first post here :) Never dare do it before. It's no gorgeous
> picture but i was especially happy of it : it's one of the scene i used
> to debug next version of Truevision ( 0.5.4 - coming soon ! ) So i'm
> just happy of the work we made on the modeller. Firt scene ( a few years
> ago ) was a yellow box and ... nothing else. Still csg only but almost
> all objects will be there in 0.5.4. All comments are welcome :)
Well, the top almost qualifies as a reflective sphere, but I can't find a
checkered plane anywhere ;-) (The "traditional" first post is some sort of
variation of the "reflective sphere on checkered plane" cliche'.)
Seriously, very nice modeling. Looking forward to more!
Dave Matthews
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Dave Matthews" <dma### [at] wrmnwestmnscuedu> wrote:
> Vincent LE PRINCE <vin### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> > Hi folks !
> >
> > This is my first post here :) Never dare do it before. It's no gorgeous
> > picture but i was especially happy of it : it's one of the scene i used
> > to debug next version of Truevision ( 0.5.4 - coming soon ! ) So i'm
> > just happy of the work we made on the modeller. Firt scene ( a few years
> > ago ) was a yellow box and ... nothing else. Still csg only but almost
> > all objects will be there in 0.5.4. All comments are welcome :)
>
> Well, the top almost qualifies as a reflective sphere, but I can't find a
> checkered plane anywhere ;-) (The "traditional" first post is some sort of
> variation of the "reflective sphere on checkered plane" cliche'.)
>
> Seriously, very nice modeling. Looking forward to more!
>
> Dave Matthews
Off-topic, but why does this thread not appear in my newsreader? (I use
Mozilla, if that makes any difference.)
Dave Matthews
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Dave Matthews nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2005-05-23 15:22:
>
> Off-topic, but why does this thread not appear in my newsreader? (I use
> Mozilla, if that makes any difference.)
>
> Dave Matthews
>
I don't know! I use mozilla Thunderbird without any problem.
Alain
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Dave Matthews wrote:
> "Dave Matthews" <dma### [at] wrmnwestmnscuedu> wrote:
>
>>Vincent LE PRINCE <vin### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>>
>>>Hi folks !
>>>
>>> This is my first post here :) Never dare do it before. It's no gorgeous
>>>picture but i was especially happy of it : it's one of the scene i used
>>>to debug next version of Truevision ( 0.5.4 - coming soon ! ) So i'm
>>>just happy of the work we made on the modeller. Firt scene ( a few years
>>>ago ) was a yellow box and ... nothing else. Still csg only but almost
>>>all objects will be there in 0.5.4. All comments are welcome :)
>>
>>Well, the top almost qualifies as a reflective sphere, but I can't find a
>>checkered plane anywhere ;-) (The "traditional" first post is some sort of
>>variation of the "reflective sphere on checkered plane" cliche'.)
>>
>>Seriously, very nice modeling. Looking forward to more!
>>
>>Dave Matthews
>
>
> Off-topic, but why does this thread not appear in my newsreader? (I use
> Mozilla, if that makes any difference.)
>
> Dave Matthews
>
possibly because it is attached to a much older thread with the same
subject. Mine is that of 28-11-2001.
hmm, is there a point in answering if you can't see the thread?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
andrel wrote:
>> Off-topic, but why does this thread not appear in my newsreader? (I use
>> Mozilla, if that makes any difference.)
>>
>> Dave Matthews
>>
> possibly because it is attached to a much older thread with the same
> subject. Mine is that of 28-11-2001.
>
> hmm, is there a point in answering if you can't see the thread?
Anyone who isn't here, raise your hand and say "Absent". ;-)
-=- Larry -=-
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I'm using Thunderbird as well, and I see the thread... sort of. I
actually see all the threads that start with "First post" linked
together. 11 independent threads presented as one.
Larry Hudson wrote:
> andrel wrote:
>
>>> Off-topic, but why does this thread not appear in my newsreader? (I use
>>> Mozilla, if that makes any difference.)
>>>
>>> Dave Matthews
>>>
>> possibly because it is attached to a much older thread with the same
>> subject. Mine is that of 28-11-2001.
>>
>> hmm, is there a point in answering if you can't see the thread?
>
>
> Anyone who isn't here, raise your hand and say "Absent". ;-)
>
> -=- Larry -=-
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
andrel wrote:
> hmm, is there a point in answering if you can't see the thread?
;-) It shows in the web version, fine. But now I see that it is also
in the newsreader, just, as you say, waaaay up top in the older threads.
Dave Matthews
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |