|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The small diamonds look ok(ish) to me, but taking into account that those
gems are all one model, ('combined' in Wings), I wonder why the larger stone
has a darker appearance given that they all have the same pigment, texture,
etc?
~Steve~
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'rings.jpg' (181 KB)
Preview of image 'rings.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
> The small diamonds look ok(ish) to me, but taking into account that those
> gems are all one model, ('combined' in Wings), I wonder why the larger stone
> has a darker appearance given that they all have the same pigment, texture,
> etc?
>
>
> ~Steve~
Interiors scale poorly. Give the large diamond's interior a scale equal to
1/[the scale factor of the whole diamond]. That should fix it.
-s
5TF!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. wrote:
> The small diamonds look ok(ish) to me, but taking into account that
> those gems are all one model, ('combined' in Wings), I wonder why the
> larger stone has a darker appearance given that they all have the same
> pigment, texture, etc?
>
>
> ~Steve~
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Fascinating rings. Great design details, that degree of scale change
(between the imprints and teh ring over all ) is fairly difficult in
mesh which your notes suggest to me you are using.
The display feels a bit forced to me though. I am guessing that you
trying to act on the usual advice have lots of textures to be reflected
in the metal surface. But I find the horizontal texture just too muddy
and busy and it's slight greenish cast does poorly together with the
strong yellow. I keep wanting either a more desaturated yellow in the
ring or some red somewhere to set it off. Did you by any chance try a
less busy stone texture for the dislay surface? And I would take away
the blue infinite plane altogether. I have been looking at the display
pedestals that artists like Giacometti or Brancusi made for their own works.
http://www.compendiuminstitute.org/library/presentations/kmitalk/images/Giacometti.jpg
http://www.artlex.com/ArtLex/s/images/sculp_branc.mus.lg.jpg
Just the idea of embrassing the display as an abbreviated element that
is a matter of convention and artistry
http://www21.brinkster.com/jrcsurvey/digital%20art/large/rcavalli.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2005-05-21 22:02:
> The small diamonds look ok(ish) to me, but taking into account that
> those gems are all one model, ('combined' in Wings), I wonder why the
> larger stone has a darker appearance given that they all have the same
> pigment, texture, etc?
>
>
> ~Steve~
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
The scane use fade_color and fade_distance to colour the diamonds. When you scale up
the object,
there is more interior to concidere. As the size augment, it become a multiple of the
fade_distance,
causing the whole to become darker.
The solution is, usualy, to increase the fade_distance.
Alain
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
St. wrote:
>
I like the design on the stamped ring. Very macho.
-Shay
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I like those rings... and the small diamonds are pretty nice too.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |