 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Jaime Vives Piqueres
Subject: No lights, no rad... just HDRI reflection [50K]
Date: 16 Apr 2005 15:47:04
Message: <42616bb8@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This is an old model I found while searching for interesting HDRI
targets. I've enhanced some of the pieces with Wings3D, changed the
trademark (sorry, it was irresistible... ;) and used "the kitchen" hdr
to lighten it. At some point I forgot to turn on the radiosity, and the
result looked nice anyhow, with a beautiful contrast.
The image took 8 min. to render, using pre-clipped focal blur.
--
Jaime
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'reloj-hdri-5-tk-refl.jpg' (50 KB)
Preview of image 'reloj-hdri-5-tk-refl.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Anthony D'Agostino
Subject: Re: No lights, no rad... just HDRI reflection [50K]
Date: 16 Apr 2005 17:44:09
Message: <42618729$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Impressive! Was the found model yours or from the net?
It's a good thing that you are so forgetful. :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Matt Burns
Subject: Re: No lights, no rad... just HDRI reflection [50K]
Date: 17 Apr 2005 05:45:10
Message: <42623026@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi!
> I've enhanced some of the pieces with Wings3D, changed the
> trademark (sorry, it was irresistible... ;)
Very realistic (as always Jaime). I thought however the "original" trademark
was misspelled.
Matt
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jaime Vives Piqueres <jai### [at] ignorancia org> wrote:
> This is an old model I found while searching for interesting HDRI
> targets. I've enhanced some of the pieces with Wings3D, changed the
> trademark (sorry, it was irresistible... ;) and used "the kitchen" hdr
> to lighten it. At some point I forgot to turn on the radiosity, and the
> result looked nice anyhow, with a beautiful contrast.
>
> The image took 8 min. to render, using pre-clipped focal blur.
>
> --
> Jaime
OK, this may sound like a daft question but what is pre-clipped focal blur.
Does this improve the speed of renders using focal blur? If so do you have
any links to information about this, I had a quick look but couldn't find
any reference to this technique.
Very nice picture BTW..
Thanks,
Sean
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Zeger Knaepen
Subject: Re: No lights, no rad... just HDRI reflection [50K]
Date: 17 Apr 2005 09:40:47
Message: <4262675f@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Jaime Vives Piqueres" <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> schreef in bericht
news:42616bb8@news.povray.org...
> This is an old model I found while searching for interesting HDRI
> targets. I've enhanced some of the pieces with Wings3D, changed the
> trademark (sorry, it was irresistible... ;)
sweet!
but, but!
shouldn't that be "AWSOME ROLEX" ? :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Zeger Knaepen wrote:
> "Jaime Vives Piqueres" <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> schreef in bericht
> news:42616bb8@news.povray.org...
>
>>This is an old model I found while searching for interesting HDRI
>>targets. I've enhanced some of the pieces with Wings3D, changed the
>>trademark (sorry, it was irresistible... ;)
>
>
> sweet!
>
> but, but!
> shouldn't that be "AWSOME ROLEX" ? :)
>
>
Maybe it depends on where you live. Awesome is legit in some circles:
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=awesome
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=awsome
Spock
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Zeger Knaepen
Subject: Re: No lights, no rad... just HDRI reflection [50K]
Date: 17 Apr 2005 11:24:30
Message: <42627fae$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Spock" <Spo### [at] nospamcom> schreef in bericht
news:4262723e$1@news.povray.org...
> Zeger Knaepen wrote:
> > "Jaime Vives Piqueres" <jai### [at] ignoranciaorg> schreef in bericht
> > news:42616bb8@news.povray.org...
> >
> >>This is an old model I found while searching for interesting HDRI
> >>targets. I've enhanced some of the pieces with Wings3D, changed the
> >>trademark (sorry, it was irresistible... ;)
> >
> >
> > sweet!
> >
> > but, but!
> > shouldn't that be "AWSOME ROLEX" ? :)
> >
> >
>
> Maybe it depends on where you live. Awesome is legit in some circles:
>
> http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=awesome
>
> http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?va=awsome
nono, I know the right way to spell it is "awesome", but "AWSOME ROLEX" is a
reference to someone who posted a Rolex-image, a few years ago, which he
said he modelled and rendered using POV-Ray but apparently he didn't model
it and it wasn't rendered with POV-Ray. The subject of that post was
"AWSOME ROLEX". So now, when they call something an "AWSOME ROLEX" they
mean it's too good to be true, too realistic to be made with POV-Ray.
Isn't that story part of the vfaq? :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: B Gimeno
Subject: Re: No lights, no rad... just HDRI reflection [50K]
Date: 17 Apr 2005 12:57:00
Message: <4262955c$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
mensaje news:42627fae$1@news.povray.org...
>
> nono, I know the right way to spell it is "awesome", but "AWSOME ROLEX" is
a
> reference to someone who posted a Rolex-image, a few years ago, which he
> said he modelled and rendered using POV-Ray but apparently he didn't model
> it and it wasn't rendered with POV-Ray. The subject of that post was
> "AWSOME ROLEX". So now, when they call something an "AWSOME ROLEX" they
> mean it's too good to be true, too realistic to be made with POV-Ray.
>
> Isn't that story part of the vfaq? :)
>
and the story was from 1999:.
http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.images/thread/%3C371e9151.0%40news.po
vray.org%3E/?mtop=143242
very interesting as a flaming-troller thread, anyways
--
B Gimeno
estoeslarealidad
http://usuarios.lycos.es/game2413
light_source{0,1}#local C=cylinder{x*-2,x*2,0.9}difference{box{-1,1}
object{C pigment{red 1}}object{C rotate y*90pigment{green 1}}object{
C rotate z*90 pigment{blue 1}}pigment{rgb 3}rotate 45 translate z*4}
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Jaime Vives Piqueres
Subject: Re: No lights, no rad... just HDRI reflection [50K]
Date: 17 Apr 2005 14:24:03
Message: <4262a9c3@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
s.day wrote:
> OK, this may sound like a daft question but what is pre-clipped focal blur.
It's not a technique, but a basic behavior of the program. See my
last post on p.unofficial.patches, with subject "To clip or not to
clip...". There are also many discussions about this "hot" topic on
these newsgroups: just search for "clipping"...
> Does this improve the speed of renders using focal blur?
I didn't test it, sorry: I only wanted to get ride of the grainy
results. But I think the speed should be similar with both methods.
--
Jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Jaime Vives Piqueres
Subject: Re: No lights, no rad... just HDRI reflection [50K]
Date: 17 Apr 2005 14:27:16
Message: <4262aa84$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Matt Burns wrote:
> Very realistic (as always Jaime). I thought however the "original" trademark
> was misspelled.
Yep... it was to avoid legal issues: perhaps that troll has
registered the original trademark. :)
--
Jaime
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
